cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/12077965

It has been a month since the last time I’ve posted about Treedome. Back then it was still in 0.4.0 and there’s a lot of little tiny tidbits of missing/bugged components.

I’ve polished it since then, please take a look https://codeberg.org/solver-orgz/treedome/compare/0.4...0.4.5!

Notable changes since then are:

  • Node path will now be visible on editor, made sure user make less mistake when editing their note
  • The width of note tree and text editor is now configurable
  • Configurable idle timeout that will close and save your notes, defaulted to 300,000 ms or 5 minutes
  • Removed about menu, now user can easily click on big badges which will open links to our repository, matrix room, etc.
  • Various fixes and little adjustments

Install it on arch (btw) and nix (0.4.5 is in review not merged yet)

  • Cwilliams@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Pros

    • Encrypted
    • Written in Rust
    • Not Electron

    Cons

    • It’s not markdown
    • No plugins

    Personally, I’m going to stick to Obsidian, because my notes are already there, in markdown, and I can encrypt them with GPG if I want to. But I love to see other options in this space!

    • tengkuizdihar@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks for the review! The reason for both of the cons are:

      • markdown: IIRC the WYSIWYG rich text editor that Treedome use doesn’t use markdown to store its text because there are better alternative for a structured and stylized document that’s also extensible. It’s stored in JSON with Tiptap’s own defined structure.
      • no plugins: never say never, but I intend to make treedome with a stable file format. Plugins may (will) introduce instability because it could change the way documents are stored.