• NostraDavid@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Does multiple research papers count? All of them related to the Relational Model, the foundation for relational database management systems. I’m also currently digging through the Postgres manual (only 3000 pages short).

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    More people need to read “1984” and understand that it’s a warning, not a “how-to” guide.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      1984 is still a work of fiction, and one that is not really making suggestions on how to combat dystopia. It’s a warning, sure, but reading leftist theory that actually makes analysis and provides suggestions on what to practically do is more useful.

      • NutWrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        1984 doesn’t have a happy ending, unless your idea of a happy ending is a man going insane. Oceania was always a lost cause. The point of warnings is that you’re supposed to avoid the thing they’re warning you against.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          The Oceania itself could not be reformed from the inside, it had to be dismantled, and ultimately isn’t by the end of the book, yes. Orwell never tries to show how to fix the problem, nor does he explain the mechanisms or forces that led to Oceania. Thus, 1984 is a depiction of what could be, in order to say “avoid this,” without recommending a course of action.

          Leftist theory on the other hand does focus on mechanisms, existing material conditions, frames of analysis, and propositions to enact change and what change to enact.

          1984 is a fine book to read for enjoyment, but not for changing society.

          • NutWrench@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            The only rebellion shown in the book is Goldstein’s manifesto and even that turns out to be a lie. The State invented Goldstein’s rebellion to weed out Thought criminals. And Winston fell for it.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yep, it does a great job of just being doomer and fun to engage with on the basis of story, but not applicable to reality.

              • NutWrench@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                The point (which I guess I needed to point out) is that this isn’t a work of fiction, anymore. Government has been granted unprecedented power to conduct surveillance on innocent people with no warrants or accountability. Companies carry out data harvesting and location tracking in nearly every consumer product connected to the Internet. Microsoft has literally incorporated spyware into Windows 11 (CoPilot / Recall). We are living in a real life surveillance state right NOW and our government and corporations are clearly fine with it. And that’s where the “how-to” guide comes into it. That’s the BAD THING. I really didn’t think I needed to spell it out, but damn.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Yes, we already live in a dystopia, reading 1984 does not tell people how to escape that in any capacity nor does it suggest how to prevent it.

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Orwell literally fought on the side of anarcho-communists in the Spanish civil war though. Doesn’t that tell you a bit about what type of system he was criticising with the book?

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    The noun doesn’t matter after an adjective like ‘multiple.’ Nothing good ever follows ‘multiple.’

    -Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!

  • moonburster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you want to read more, don’t listen to others with recommendations. Find something that you like and find books about it. Don’t like it, find another and sell or giveaway your first one. Everyone can read, but not everyone is made to read heavy tomes and they also don’t need too!

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Getting an EReader has increased the rate at which I read drastically. Reading becomes less of a task and more of a convenient way to spend time.

    Reading Marx and Engels is also a great primer for anyone getting into Leftist theory.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not yet, getting an EReader has really accelerated my reading, but I really want to hammer in the basics before moving on to the likes of Parenti and Losurdo. Plus, I have queer theory like Trans Liberation: Beyond Pink and Blue as well as Fanon’s works on colonialism I want to visit before then.

    • moonburster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Man seconding this. My reading goal was 20 books and I have smashed it before half of the year was over. Few years ago I couldn’t even read got in a year

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yep, same! Not quite at that pace but it totally reversed my years-long spell of not being able to finish a single book in a year

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      In spirit of the post, Wage Labor and Capital, Value, Price and Profit, and Critique of the Gotha Programme are the easiest to digest works by Marx, and the most applicable to general leftism. All are short reads too, each can be completed in around an hour.

      Engels has some great works too, and his works are generally grouped in with Marx’s because they worked together closely, but I kept it to strictly Marx.

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        People should read Value Price and Profit because Marx proved that inflation is just companies raising prices, thoroughly debunks all the lies about causes of inflation that economists have been using to protect profits since before even his time.

        All solid suggestions.

        Wrt critique of the Gotha programme, it’s interesting to me that Marx was such a critic of Lassalle, so much so that Engels actually apologized for Marx’s harsh criticisms of the social democrat. Marx had called Lassalle a would be petty dictator or something like that. Except he was right, Lassalle was secretly plotting with von Bismarck on a plan to unify Germany under a bourgeois led social democracy, which von Bismarck could later seize absolute control over. Marx didn’t know about this conspiracy, he just reasoned it out.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          WLaC is also good, because it describes the role of Capital itself within Capitalism as it relates to Workers, and thus allows Capitalists to exploit them.

          CotGP is added because it clears up a ton of misconceptions people who have not read Marx yet consider themselves leftists have about Marx and what he advocated for, practically. He essentially dismantles a weak Socialist/Social Democrat plan and explains the transition to Communism. He even adds on just how lengthy a process reaching higher-stage Communism will be.

          Edit for your edit:

          Yep, it’s always cool to see logical analysis lead to correct conclusions that later make themselves apparent. It’s funny how often Marx ended up being correct even on limited information simply due to strong analysis.

          • Juice@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah I read WL&C after a failed attempt at reading Capital (I had never read much Marx other than the manifesto at that point) and realized I needed to understand his economics first, as I felt completely out of my depth. Turns out reading Capital v1, the first few chapters are just like that! But I’m glad I read WL&C, like you said its short and gave me something to chew on for a year or so before diving back into the big book.

            I edited my comment above about CotGP. All solid recommendations, for exactly the reasons you state.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Sorry Carl, I ain’t reading shit. I might listen to an audiobook, but I’m not promising anything