• Moss@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    world’s worst post title. Jesus.
    what are you, a comedian with faltering popularity?
    This is literally just “haha I might trigger you snowflake liberals but that’s just cuz you can’t take a joke”

  • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Angry only because you’re exposing that she’s a communist sleeper agent. Keep it under wraps until she’s in

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 months ago

    All three are saying the same thing.

    Everything we are is the result of things that happened before. We can use the power of the past to push ourselves forward, or be overwhelmed by it.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 months ago

        A retired teacher once told me that the funniest thing about high schoolers is that they’ll repeat something they read in an old book and act like they discovered something brand new.

        • RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well it was a brand new discovery to them, and if they found value in it then it makes sense that they’d want to repeat it. But yeah, I guess I can see why that’s “funny” coming from the perspective of an older person who may have forgotten what it’s like to be a young, inexperienced kid capable of feeling fascination and wonder.

          • qarbone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            The be/amusement is at the appropriation some teens (unwittingly) do. Presenting something well-observed and well-documented as a novel thought is laughable. If an acquaintance walked up to you and said “I’ve just figured out fire is dangerous and people not liking you back makes you sad” you’d either laugh or worry they’d taken brain damage.

            But, in fairness, you don’t and shouldn’t have to cram citations into every social media post. And we also could probably do better about giving kids the mindset and the resources to research things that interest them so they don’t have badly reinvent the wheel every adolescence.

            • RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yeah, I see where you’re coming from. Although instead of laughing I’d probably reply with “sounds like it’s time for a story.” Because I think I would assume that something happened to them recently that highlighted the danger of fire lol

              “Presenting something well-observed and well-documented as a novel thought is laughable.” I really like this sentence. It made me realize that I’d interpret “laughable” as either “humorous” or “ridiculous” depending on the context. Specifically regarding how genuine the person is being, which is impossible to be sure of. You can only make assumptions about whether a person is being genuine/honest, although you can get more comfortable with those assumptions as you get to know them better.

              Those types of “hey did you know water is wet?” comments can also serve as a jumping off points for sarcastic remarks with friends.

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I remember being 15 and laughing at people my age who thought that “Catcher In The Rye” was written about them.