• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d say that this is one of the few exceptions to the “those who can’t do teach” stereotype being bullshit but clearly he sucks at teaching others ethics as much as he sucks at being ethical in his own behavior 🤷

    • BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Those who can’t do teach, and those who can’t teach manage. After working with normal people, teachers and managers I have concluded that managers should be excluded from homo sapiens sapiens. They are more like chimpanzees with some learnt behaviours that they don’t fully understand but will perform for a treat.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t actually think I know what a manager is. I’ve always thought it was synonymous with supervisor, but I’m a supervisor and I do all the work the guys I work with do plus the “manager” responsibilities. There is no time where I’m just sitting around sipping coffee or whatever the memes are. I’m building shit and fixing the problems my team come across.

        I guess I’ve just never worked in a place where I’ve had the kind of management people complain about.

    • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I guess I look at this as the teacher setting the tone early to disabuse the students of any false notions of what the ethics class actually is. Shame they did it in such a shitty way, but I see that as part of their point too. I’m not sure I believe the scenario is necessarily real, but if it is, the message would be appear to be that going forward everyone must understand that this isn’t going to be about how to be ethical, but how to appear to meet artificial requirements that pay lip service to ethics. A teaching to the test kind of approach.

      Teaching explicitly that they should act unethically (lie about their ethical convictions) to ensure they meet future expectations of falsely signalled ethics, and teaching that through a pretty unethical act of deception and public humiliation delivers this message quite succinctly and makes it pretty clear what to expect here on in.

  • sheepishly@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “ha ha no judgement (:” proceeds to judge

    methinks professor is not very ethical

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Anon had a massive dunk on his professor lined up.

    “You said there would be no judgement and said that people should lie rather than put an accurate score on an ethics survey. Wouldn’t that make your score lower than 36 then?”

  • jmsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    why are ethics and sustainability in the same class? They are 2 different fields. It’d be like lumping a sociology and math class together.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s a Harvard Professor named Richard Wolfe who always likes to tickle his audience by asking the question “Why do universities have an Economics department that’s distinct and separate from the Business School?” And then he gets into the distinctions between the western ideology around economic planning relative to the practical education around running an efficient business.

      The People’s Republic of Walmart also goes into this bifrication of western understanding of efficient economic practices. Theorists preach the value of competition and choice and flexibility and auction pricing, while successful CEOs tend to prefer strict hierarchies over regional monopolies with steady schedules and well-defined quotas and flat fees.

    • nul9o9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Listening to professors who are also chief officers of companies tickle the balls of capitalistic idealogies to young adults fresh out of high school.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        On the one hand, this is a great article. On the other, I now have to go the rest of my day knowing that I said that about an article published by the Guardian.

  • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    264
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Professor was acting unethically.

    He claimed there would be no judgement, and then didn’t follow through on that condition.

    He also instructed the student to lie in the future.

    Where is my A+?


    taking a greentext as a true story

  • ClockNimble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nah, he wants to see if anon can be shamed about his lack of ethics.

    If he is shameless, CEO behavior.

    If he is ashamed, McDonald’s behavior.

    If you lie about it, then just par for the course and you can be a broker anywhere. Gotta feed out the line to find the narcissistic socios and not the stealthy ones.

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Aye same thought. He was testing the group. OP should have been blunt like “IDGAF and was the only one of you honest enough to admit it”