• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      If Microsoft didn’t have a decades-long record of pulling shit like this, they might get the benefit of the doubt.

      • Shadow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        28 days ago

        Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          I hate this phrase.

          A lot of the time, people (and especially monopolistic, tax-dodging, $3.2 trillion multinationals with a long history of anti-competitive behaviour) really are just cunts.

          Time and time again, we see big companies doing anything they can to destroy competition, mislead customers, etc.

          Never attribute to stupidity what can be adequately explained by malice.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            stupidity is a once-off

            malice is a pattern

            and even if it’s not malicious, a pattern of stupid action needs to be stopped just as much as malicious action

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          28 days ago

          Stupidity doesn’t adequately explain the number of times they have done this. I’m surprised it’s even a headline anymore.

        • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          28 days ago

          Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity

          Emphasis mine. Incompetence on Microsoft’s part is not an adequate explanation for this latest action matching a pattern of other actions designed to antagonize FOSS users.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          28 days ago

          Microsoft has been consistently “stupid” for a very long time about this one particular thing.

  • h0bbl3s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    I dual booted a few times back in the days of winxp and win7. Never had a good experience somehow windows or a grub update always messed up things. Haven’t ran windows in years but when I have to it goes on a separate drive now.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      People who dual boot are likely to be linux newbies just trying it out. They’re more likely to blame linux when microsoft does what it does to competitors.

      • MagnumDovetails@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        28 days ago

        I dual boot and am maybe considered a newbie. But I’ve had this set up for about a year slowly preparing to stop using Microsoft crap. It’s part of a longer path to digital privacy that was kicked into gear when the win 11 update made my Wi-Fi card disappear, like gone- like it was never installed. Fuck HP and Microsoft

        Ironically I had disabled secure boot to try another distro. Was going to drop Ubuntu for something else, still might but no rush, plenty to learn.

        • ThunderChunk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          28 days ago

          As a noob myself I can suggest KDE Neon. It’s quite similar to Windows. I switched 2 of my machines over and when the security updates stop for Windows 10 my gaming machine will switch also. I’m very satisfied 6 months in.

        • obbeel@lemmy.eco.brOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          28 days ago

          It’s not just about privacy. Linux and open source communities are a safespace for a novel way of doing things.

          • MagnumDovetails@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            28 days ago

            I’ve noticed that, I also appreciate you can kinda tinker which I appreciate. It’s wild being so accustomed to the limited control you have from using windows and mainstream software

      • Unquote0270@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        That’s not necessarily true, I dual boot and I’ve been using Linux for my main OS for about 15 years now. I rarely use mine but it is useful/needed occasionally.

      • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        I blame Linux distributions for not updating when the security vulnerability has been fixed for years a little more than I blame Microsoft for untrusting old vulnerable software versions. That said, failing to figure out if it is dual booting or not when there are multiple ways of doing it was not really a surprise.

        (I also remember when some Fedora ISOs were unbootable immediately after release a few years ago for similar issues, they hadn’t updated shim or similar)

  • timmytbt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    27 days ago

    So, excusing my ignorance as a fairly recent Linux convert, what does this mean for my dual boot system?

    I haven’t booted windows for weeks and am pretty sure there have been no updates since it was freshly reinstalled (maybe 6 months ago) as a dual boot with Debian.

    Is this only a problem if I allow Windows to update?

    Are Microsoft likely to fix the issue in a subsequent release?

    • Kuma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      27 days ago

      Yes, you don’t have to worry as long as you don’t boot up windows and let it install the update.

      This is not the first time they break dual boots by touching the partitions, but this is the first time they deliberately break it (that I know of). I always had windows on its own drive because of that. If you don’t use windows a lot then I would suggest to do the same. You have to change to windows through bios but it isn’t that much more work.

      • Kuma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        And just in case when installing windows on its own drive, only have the windows drive mounted so it doesn’t write to the linux drive.

      • timmytbt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        27 days ago

        Thanks for the reply, and good to know!

        I think I’ll blow away the windows install on this machine completely.

        I still have another pc for some audio tools that don’t run under Linux, but this machine is my daily driver now and I couldn’t be happier.

    • ochi_chernye@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      27 days ago

      FWIW, I’m dual-booting windows and mint atm. Separate drives, but just one EFI partition, and this update hasn’t borked things for me.

  • priapus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    28 days ago

    If you need to dual boot, be sure to use separate EFI partitions for windows and Linux, separate drives if possible. Windows has done this far too many times.

  • slembcke@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    28 days ago

    Doesn’t Windows break dual booting semi-regularly? I’ve always avoided it as I’ve had friends get burned by this in the past. I guess I just keep different OSes on different drives, but that obviously isn’t feasible for everyone.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      I have dualboot set-up on my MacBook and have no. But it is a long time ago, since I last started macOS and my Mac would not get new macOS updates anyway😂 that was the reason to install Linux in the first place 😝

    • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      Legit have never had an issue with multi boot and windows like ever, tbf I don’t go into windows that frequently anymore but it’s never given me grief in at least a decade. I know my experience isn’t universal though, so sorry to anyone who does have boot issues after windows updates.

      In the worst case, could use bcdedit and use the windows boot loader (tbh I have no idea if that works here, but could be worth a try)

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      I know that used to be the case. It’s why I stopped trying to use a dual-booting system and instead just installed windows in Virtualbox.

    • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      28 days ago

      I never did dual boot. The first time moving from windows 2000 to Linux, my hard drive was only 2 GB and I couldn’t fit both of the OS:es on it, so I nuked the windows one.

      • azimir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        28 days ago

        At one point my 1GB disk was the “big one” in the dorm. It was the windows share of some random media. I had room for the whole 40MB videos “Jesus vs Frosty” (The Spirit of Christmas) and “Jesus vs Santa Claus”. It was before South Park became an actual show, but people watched those 100’s of times off my hard drive.

        When I bought a 3GB from Fry’s it was an open question how we’d fill it. Of course, that was just as the mp3 codec started to gain traction… Problem solved.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    Is there any issue with having windows on one drive and Linux on the other and toggling in the bios at boot? Do I introduce any problems by keeping my rarely used windows installation on a separate disk like this?

    • obbeel@lemmy.eco.brOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’m not sure, but clearly something happens on the background, as my Debian drive broke after I changed it back and forth for the Windows drive. Grub fell back to rescue mode. After following some instructions and trying to boot from grub command line, Debian wouldn’t boot after it recognized the mouse. That’s what I know. Even in different drives, something happens on the PC when you go back and forth with Windows and Linux.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        I should have been more clear,

        Assuming dev/sda is Linux and dev/sdb is Windows, I have grub on sda and Windows bootloader on sdb. I use a hotkey at boot to tell the bios which drive to boot from.

        Theoretically windows thinks it’s the only OS unless it’s scoping out that second hard disk.

        • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          It updates Secure Boot in the BIOS, so you could completely remove Windows but the Secure Boot update would still be in the BIOS and affect the boot loader.