The administration claimed that blocking arms transfers would embolden Hamas — ignoring Israel’s genocidal slaughter.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Of Democrat Politicians, sure.

        Of Democrat Supporters, it’s almost the opposite - if I remember it correctly over 70% of Democrat Supporters were against what Israel is doing in a poll not that long ago.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It failed on the floor, but got an impressive 18 votes, I think. Done.

    All Republicans voted against it.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      That was guaranteed, the Democrats that voted against it is the important part; these are the people to campaign against and vote out.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Sure, then you can have Republicans replace them and be assured it never comes up for a vote at all. The logic is outstanding.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The logic is outstanding.

          You mean the logic of just ignoring that primaries exist in order to prop op the false dichotomy that led to losing all parts of the government to a literal fascist party?

          Yeah, your logic IS outstandingly bad.

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            Republicans will not allow a vote on the floor to limit Israeli arms. Democrats did. Simple

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Again falsely assuming that the only Democrats possible are the crappy Republican Lite Neoliberals that lost everything to the fascists 🙄

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  This you?

                  Fact is that yours is the majority opinion of the rich donors and their pet politicians, but mine is the majority opinion of the people in general.

        • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          How are you still making this argument? I hope you’re a bot, because if that’s a human brain behind these words that’s depressing.

          Voting-oriented do nothing liberals are just waiting with their thumbs up their asses for one more chance to vote for the “lesser evil” Democrats who are worse than the “greater evil” Republicans of 20 years ago.

          I don’t want to hear any more complaints from liberals until they fucking get out in the streets and actually take meaningful political actions that matter. Voting is nothing now, don’t you see? If enough of you cowards joined the left in being anti-genocide, if enough of you joined protests and riots and strikes and actual direct action, if enough of you considered voting to be the bare minimum and not the entirety of your civic duty, then and only then would we actually see any improvement.

          I’m sick of hearing about how people didn’t vote properly. get the fuck out there and take real action. If not now, when?

          You’re the people standing idly by and enabling the greatest evils. You’re the ones future generations will be asking about when they say “why didn’t anyone do anything?”

          Nobody is going to talk about a minority of leftists choosing not to vote pro-genocide. They’re all going to be talking about do nothing cowardly Democrats watching their country go to shit because voting is the only thing they consider political action.

          Stop punching left. Join us on the left and punch back. You fucking idiots.

            • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Keep running, that’s my point. You’re useless now and will be for at least 4 years. Leave the work to the grown ups

              Edit: Oh my God I think he means running for office. He literally can’t imagine political action outside of elections. Libs gonna lib.

              • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                2 days ago

                A Senate term is 6 years. Before a run it might be good for the grown ups to check the particulars.

        • fukhueson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Exactly. There’s going to be a lot of calls for Democrats to eat each other in the next 4 years.

            • fukhueson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              For some, that time is coming. Come nov 2026 midterms all class 2 senators are up for reelection (and then class 3 in 2028). While there are more Republicans up at that point than Democrats, the strategy will be the same, and many of those Republican seats seem pretty safe.

              https://www.senate.gov/senators/Class_II.htm

              • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                2 days ago

                And Republicans will never allow the Senate to vote on arms supply to Israel. It’s really that simple.

                • fukhueson@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Yep. And trolls will paint this as “both sides the same.” I wonder if Trump will get a “genocide” moniker?

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Could be using his last days on something constructive, or to earn lower and midde class trust back. Instread why not one last war crime for the road.

          • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Yes but I’m not obligated to provide you one.

            I’m not looking for a legal debate or sealioning or any other drawn out conversation about this topic.

            Some things that are noteworthy are that the United States is violating its own laws as pointed out by Sanders, and the ICC just put out warrants for Netenyahu and Gallant, so whether or not we debate the particulars Biden is involved in those crimes

            • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              2 days ago

              Breaking US law does not equal a war crime as OP suggested.

              If you ever want to name an actual war crime, I’ll get the notification.

              • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                2 days ago

                Heyyyy there’s that bullshit I was talking about… Why don’t you keep busy by writing an essay about how Putin’s war is illegal but Biden’s genocide is A-OK because it’s just not from the champagne region of Russia.

                I’ll get the notification

              • kreskin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’ll name the war crime, and you could too if you did a google search for it.

                We’re bound by the geneva conventions, that we did sign, and the articles regarding complicity in genocide wre in the signed articles. So yes, it is US law.

                "According to Article 1 of the Genocide Convention, the Contracting Parties, including the United States and Israel, must prevent and punish acts of genocide. Under Article III, those punishable acts include “Complicity in genocide,” such as by knowingly providing the deadly weapons used to carry it out. In 2007, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in a case involving Bosnia and Serbia, established that the obligation to refrain from providing weapons or other assistance begins the moment a state becomes aware of the existence of a serious risk that genocide may be committed.

                For the Biden administration, that moment came in January, when the ICJ found that there was a “plausible” risk of genocide being committed in Gaza against the Palestinian people by Israel."

                https://www.thenation.com/article/world/biden-complicity-genocide/

                • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Holy shit, a real answer and not just some snarky bullshit response!

                  Thanks for actually taking the time to engage. I’m not being disingenuous. OP just said their was a “pile of war crimes”.

                  So is “the pile of war crimes” are all regarding the sale of weapons?

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Aiding and abetting crimes against humanity by supplying weapons and funds while knowing EXACTLY what they’re being used for.

        • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          I understand the argument and I completely disagree with sending any support to Israel so they can continue genociding Palestinians. Is what you’re referencing actually a thing though. I understand aiding and abetting, I just don’t know if that actually makes it criminal in the actual written law.

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, it does both in international and US domestic law

            Multiple provisions in U.S. law restrict the sale or provision of weapons to other countries, including the federal Arms Export Control Act, the Foreign Assistance Act, and the Leahy Law. The open letter draws on evidence from Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and other watchdogs to argue that continuing to provide weapons to Israel blatantly violates these laws, in addition to international treaties.

            • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              2 days ago

              Thank you for that. I am aware of these and I don’t see anywhere that dictates war crimes as the OP suggested. I understand the criminality but that doesn’t mean war crime.

              I was just trying to point out that screaming war crime at everything is not necessary.

              • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                US weapons are being used for war crimes tho? The US is providing military aid unconditionally, knowing full well they are being used to violate humanitarian international law. The State providing the unconditional means for another state to commit war crimes is just as culpable as the state committing the war crimes.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I sell some one a gun that I know they’re going to commit murder with. I know all the details; who, what, where, why, and when.

                Am I guilty of murder?

                Yes. The answer is yes.

              • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Do you not know how to read or are you then literally choosing to not reply in good faith to what you are reading. Either way that is toxic af and you know it.

                It is literally and by definition, a war crime.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Are you capable of saying “Israel is committing a genocide in Gaza”? If so, say it now.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      He could be using his king powers granted by the SCOTUS to give minimum wage, the funds he promised, fully cancel student debt, keep queer protections, make abortion legal, or any of the things he said he would do but somehow was always stopped.

      But he just keeps giving aid to “Literally Genocide LLC” because who cares, he’ll take that AIPAC money and run before the Trump fans start going after him.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Come back after January 20th and say that with a straight face.

          Force Republicans to visibly go after working class people, abortions, and healthcare. Force them to be the bad guy if they want to die on those hills. This has been the crumbiest of crumb trails we’ve had since Bill Clinton. Shit that’s too penne ante to actually make a difference but is celebrated like it’s another New Deal.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            He has Congress and The Senate so they can pass whatever legislation they want. They distribute the funds, the president doesn’t just magically make the funds appear. He can start a war, or use troops to run around and rip people from their homes, whether citizen or not, and then get away with it because he won’t be impeached. But what I’m saying is he can’t just say “it’s illegal to do this now” and that’s law. Unless the legislative branch gives up all its power. Which unfortunately would only save us about 100m a year and make us actually have a king. They will hide behind the false pretence that the government branches still exist because they can make everything pass they need for now. If that changes… Then they’ll break it

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              That’s why Biden should be doing positive things, not negative. Forgive all federal student loans, order Medicare to open enrollment and enroll anyone who applies, order the federal government to cover the cost of all abortions, order all government agencies, contractors and subcontractors to pay no less than the state minimum wage where the work is conducted.

              None of it will actually go through. A court in Texas will stop it the next day. But force them to be on the wrong side of the issue. Stop letting them lie about what they will do. Show some goddamn spine and just maybe people will stop thinking about Democrats as Republican Lite^tm .

              Of course, that’s the problem isn’t it? The Democrats aren’t willing to even try. Which shows us who they are.

              • kreskin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Looks like he just vetoed a ceasfire resolution in the UN security council that was unanimously approved by the other 14 members. So that solves the question of what he’s doing with his remaining time in office.

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                He tried the student loans so that’ll just look bad.

                But really how would he order the federal government to pay for things, he doesn’t hold the purse, Congress does. They would just call him off his rocker and not fit for office because he doesn’t remember how government works.

                It’d be like me walking into a car dealership and saying give me one of everything! And expecting people to cheer for me when in reality they would just laugh and think I’m an idiot.

                Maybe he could do the enrollment, HHS is run by the executive branch I believe

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The same way Trump did. By declaring an emergency and grabbing whatever funding source he wanted. Congress appropriates money but the executive still has a lot of power in using that money.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              He has Congress and The Senate so they can pass whatever legislation they want

              You mean like Biden had his first two years?

        • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          And yet, this Supreme Court will grant trump immunity for every illegal action he takes while in office.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Official acts for the president would include using the military to do something. It’s the executive branch. So yeah, he can do that. As for anything else he does that’s unconstitutional, he would have to be impeached, which both congress and the Senate would vote against now. So yea. He can get away with shit. But he can’t make legislation, he can just get Congress to write it and the Senate to sign off so the legislation goes through. Something that I don’t believe that has happened since 2009 for a 2 month span, which is when Obama forced the American Care Act through.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It sure is neat how there’s never any hoops to jump through in order to support genocide.

        • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nothing you’ve said here makes sense. Biden can’t start Trump’s term early. Just because you feel morally correct doesn’t mean rationality goes out the window. Baseless finger pointing about genocide is an extremely stupid move. Do better.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    For fucks sake. There’s fucking arrest warrants and Biden still can’t follow our own laws about not sending military aid to war criminals.

    Godfuckingdammit

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nope. I’m 41 and as appalled by the atrocities of the fascist apartheid regime as most people on the left.

      It’s a Left/Right and principles/realpolitik divide rather than one based on age.

      Especially now that Joe Rogan and troglodytes like him are winning millions of young voters over to fascism with their false demagoguery and misinformation disguised as entertainment and “hearing out both sides”.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s like Trump supporters, any facts or evidence can be dismissed with a thought terminating cliche so thoughts slide right off the smooth brained supporters.

        “Did Soros pay you?” -> “Did Russia pay you?”

        • Free_Thoughts@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          any facts or evidence can be dismissed with a thought terminating cliche

          Not in any way exclusive tactic to Trump supporters though. It’s done by most extremists on the left and right.

  • shikitohno@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Shocking absolutely nobody, there’s a deafening silence from the blue MAGA brigade that, pre-election, kept crying about how not supporting Israel 100% would sink the Democrats’ chances of winning 100% and that Trump would do oh so much worse. Democrats have already lost the election, and now they double down on a losing policy when they literally have nothing at stake.

    The only difference between a Biden and a Trump administration for Palestine is the speed at which things occur. Biden is fundamentally onboard with the same genocidal policies as Trump is willing to support.

      • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        the election did not represent all of us in the US since there is a segment of the population that is not allowed to vote

      • bestagon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        This isn’t even for our safety; most conflicts aren’t. Best I can gather, this is all about regional influence and geopolitical brownie points that don’t matter to all but the ruling class

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          No, it is about donor money. AIPAC.

          Biden has received more aipac money than any other us politician in history.

          That’s literally all it is.

          Our political system is literally corrupt.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The crats are too stupid to see thats why people stayed at home instead of voting for harris.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    He had the smallest chance to claim he didnt do it before because he wanted to make sure trump doesnt win. Now he makes sure he raise up for the Genocide Joe title.

    80% are women and children.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just an observation, I hope Ukraine can make it through all this, but when this war started news was non stop how Russia was falling on their face and losing thousands of troops and equipment.

    Now that trump won news is non stop Ukraine is losing ground and will fall without aid.

    This is why Americans are so disillusioned with all this. The propaganda machine can’t stick to a narrative and makes people feel like everything is fake. The media in this country is so fucked and a big reason why people are so uninformed.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      They were. In the early parts of the war. They’ve learned and adapted and currently outpace Ukrainians in arms, men, and doctrine.

    • Kaput@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That is no accident. The propaganda machine is perfectly tuned. Even where it appear crude and let us believe that we see through it.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Okay real talk? The Russians were falling on their face. Unfortunately they have the manpower and material to learn on the job. And that’s exactly what they’ve been doing. The big Russian gains recently also came during the 9 month drought the GOP inflicted on Ukraine’s weapons shipments.

      So now there’s a situation where Ukrainian recruitment is down, Ukrainian manpower on the front line is below optimal, the Russians have re-learned how to actually do an assault, and the Russians have recently resupplied and reinforced via North Korea.

      The situation did legitimately change.