Summary

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former defense minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas officials, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza and during the October 2023 attacks.

The court alleges actions like depriving Gaza civilians of essential resources.

Israel and the U.S., non-members of the ICC, reject the warrants, with Netanyahu calling them antisemitic.

Hamas also criticized the decision.

The practical enforcement of these warrants remains uncertain, as the ICC lacks authority to compel arrests.

  • nixcamic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Well the ICC won’t let me be or let me be me so we’ll just see. – Benjamin Netanyahu

    • BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The name of the game is sanctions. Russian can sustain itself under “nuclear” sanctions. Sanction Israel, and the comfortable lifestyle of illegal Lebensraum settlers will start to look rather unattractive.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        ICC charges are directed at individuals, not entire countries. They wouldn’t justify sanctions for the same reason governments don’t sanction Saudi Arabia for being the home of bin Laden.

        • BMTea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I couldn’t think of a more absurd analogy. If Osama Bin Laden was Saudi Arabia’s head of state, and 9/11 was carried out by the Saudi military, and Saudi was party to the Rome Statute, then maybe you make such an analogy. As it actually stands, Netanyahu’s crimes were carried out by the state of Israel and that certainly has legal bearing inside the EU’s courts, with very recent precedent - sanctions on Russia citing the ICC arrest warrant for Putin. And Russia is not even party to the Rome Statute - the state of Israel is, and would be violating by not giving Netanyahu up.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            crimes were carried out by the state

            The same is true of others facing ICC charges. For example, Hamas leaders face ICC charges, but that does not justify sanctions against Palestine.

            sanctions on Russia citing the ICC arrest

            Sanctions against Russia couldn’t cite the ICC charges, because they began long before Putin was charged by the ICC.

            the state of Israel is

            Like the US and Russia, Israel is not a party to the Rome Statute.

            • BMTea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Hamas leaders face ICC charges, but that does not justify sanctions against Palestine.

              The EU does not recognize Hamas as the legitimate representative of the Palestinian Territories. It defines it as a non-state actor and a terror group, so what you said is also a terrible analogy. I don’t know why you keep using the word “justify”. Do you mean legally or morally? Sanctions would be targetted at specific individuals, firms and military/government components, not the state of Israel as such.

              Sanctions against Russia couldn’t cite the ICC charges, because they began long before Putin was charged by the ICC.

              Packages 11-14 were all issued after the ICC judgement. European Commission’s statements on the ICC warrant speak quite clearly about Russian culpability, not just Putin’s culpability.

    • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean it’s done quite a lot to diplomatically isolate them, right? Putin couldn’t go to South Africa for BRICS, he couldn’t attend the G20 summit this week, and presumably lots of other trips he hasn’t done that he would have otherwise intended to

      In Israel’s case, I expect this will be a pain for Netanyahu more than it has been for Putin, since the set of countries that are neither ICC signatories nor actively hostile to Israel is a pretty short list

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The US and others were fine with it when they issued a warrant for Putin, I’m sure they’ll be on board for this as well, right?

    • [email protected]@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      This makes us look weak and hypocritical to the rest of the world. Stop the unjust war of aggression and annexation! No wait, I meant the other one. This one is a-OK.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        One thing that many people in America have already learned the hard way, is that conservative Americans could not care less about being hypocritical. In fact, I’m convinced that some see it as a plus because while it means nothing to them, it always seems to “trigger the libs”.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    If I ever saw this yahoo and the other yahoo putin, I would shub this yahoo up putin’s arse. It’s a little unlikely but that’s the plan. And probably poke both thru with a cable, and I would give the cable a bunch of extra twists so they couldn’t get out.

  • bigFab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    ‘‘How are you today?’’ ‘‘That’s an antisemitic question.’’

    • Gort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s what the constant cry wolf has lead to. The absurd has become real.

  • Kaput@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    One thing, why are the Hamas officials never named, and we never get their reaction? I’d really like I to be able to despise both side of that shit medal evenly.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      They’re in the article:

      The court issued a warrant for Mohammed Deif, head of Hamas’ armed wing, over the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks that triggered Israel’s offensive in Gaza…Khan withdrew requests for warrants for two other senior Hamas figures, Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh, who have both since been killed. Israel says it also killed Deif in an airstrike, but Hamas has never confirmed his death.

      Hamas in a statement welcomed the warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant but made no mention of the one against Deif.

      • Kaput@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Thank you, I should have verified before commenting. It’s still the feeling I get, that Hamas leadership is way less named than Netanyahu. If at least in the headlines.

  • Draghetta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’ve been preparing for this for a while. Months ago already I remember reading accusations of the ICC being antisemitic by Israelis and various sympathisers. The old fiddle that never stops playing.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Those warrants aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on, but it’s still nice to see official bodies outside the US calling Netanyahu what he is.

    • BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      These warrants absolutely matter in terms of being a trumo card in several legal issues relating to EU-Israel relations.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s a nice thought. I won’t hold my breath expecting any real consequences for Israel, though.

        • BMTea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          The saddest thing is that if they do take action, it will be the lowest bar possible of accountability. They’ll for example ban products from illegal settlements and then let Israel redurect them anyways.

    • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Not exactly. The ratifying countries are bound by contract to arrest them. Plus It’s a serious issue not to do it, because this would delegitimize the ICC as an institution, which is not in the interest of most ratifying countries. So it essentially boils down to a choice between losing the court as a valuable weapon against war criminals or bad relations with Israel.

      What happens after an arrest is another matter and I think that is where the real pressure would happen