NONE@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-23 days ago"The Most open Operating System"lemmy.worldimagemessage-square174fedilinkarrow-up1996arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up1986arrow-down1image"The Most open Operating System"lemmy.worldNONE@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-23 days agomessage-square174fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·3 days agoBy what definition would it be more open to advertisers and data brokers?
minus-squareitslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·3 days agoBy showing ads and selling your data
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·3 days agoI meant how that action would make it open for them? Also, if those actions make it open, would it be open to everyone (if they have money)
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days ago if they have money They’d be welcome how that action would make it open for them? Like with open source you can browse the source, but this time it’s ad-makers browsing your computer
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoI was asking which definition (open having multiple) would apply in the context of the windows OS being open to advertisers
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoI think, ‘ready to be read or used’, and ‘not limited’ fits best
Advertisers and data brokers
By what definition would it be more open to advertisers and data brokers?
By showing ads and selling your data
I meant how that action would make it open for them?
Also, if those actions make it open, would it be open to everyone (if they have money)
They’d be welcome
Like with open source you can browse the source, but this time it’s ad-makers browsing your computer
I was asking which definition (open having multiple) would apply in the context of the windows OS being open to advertisers
I think, ‘ready to be read or used’, and ‘not limited’ fits best