• prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Just because it isn’t perfect it doesn’t mean it’s useless.

    Just because there is no way to stop 100% of all crime it doesn’t mean taking measures to reduce crime is futile.

    There is a lot more to this than just blocking the site. It will also change social norms. Right now, if a 14 year old as social media, nobody bats an eye; but with the 16 year requirement, through all the sudden, parents aren’t too comfortable with letting their 14 year old have social media. So not only will they need to find some free VPN totally not spyware to use (and even know that that exists and how to use), they will also have to hide it from their parents, as it is no longer socially acceptable for 14 year olds to have social media.

    And before you say “Kids can easily get a free VPN and hide it.” Never underestimate tech illiteracy.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Kids accessing social media shouldn’t be treated as a crime.

      The future of such restriction is:

      Exhibit A: People’s Republic of China and the “Great Firewall”

      Nope, lets not go there.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The thing about kids getting a VPN, free or paid is that it will spread like wild fire. It only takes one kid who knows how to do something. They tried this at my highschool, blocking websites and such. That was more than 20 years ago and we knew how to use VPN’s or similar then and once we figured it out it was an open secret.

      I’m not saying the law shouldn’t exist or that we should do nothing. I’m saying that this isn’t going to be effective as it is and could end up leading to worse things.