• OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Didn’t know Vivaldi had this capability, I just used it because it was the only decent browser with an on/off sidebar till zen

  • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Best methods to lower the score on android? I tested multiple browsers on EFF. 17 bits regardless of browser.

  • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    16.47 on Cromite. But most of the identify information is not even true, almost everything is spoofed. User agent, timezone, operating system, browser name, screen size and color depth, device, even the battery percentage

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 183,996 tested in the past 45 days.

    :(

  • JustVik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    It constantly gives me 17.5 bits on several browsers firefox, nyxt, gnu icecat, librewolf…

  • dwindling7373@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Am I wrong to assume trying to blend in is a worse and contradictory strategy than trying to actively protect yourself from tracking?

    If you want to not be unique, use default setting chrome without adblock. Your browser will look just like anybody else’s, but they will literally know who you are.

    On the opposite side of the spectrum, you lock everything down and spike as a very special browser and… that’s all they know.

      • dwindling7373@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not what I meant: https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/3.3-Overrides-[To-RFP-or-Not]#-fingerprinting

        "If you do nothing on desktop, you are already uniquely identifiable - screen, window and font metrics alone are probably enough - add timezone name, preferred languages, and several dozen other metrics and it is game over. Here is a link to the results of a study done in 2016 showing a 99.24% unique hit rate (and that is excluding IP addresses).

        Changing a few prefs from default is not going to make you “more unique” - there is no such thing."

        Basically making yourself less unique is impossible so there’s no sensible tradeoff to be made (other than in the context of Tor and Mullvad Browser).

      • underwire212@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Right. The question is whether they can attach what they know to an identity. Depends on your threat model which goal you need to achieve.

    • ivn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      But then they can know a lot more since they don’t even need to drop a cookie to track you. But that’s a different threat model.

  • LittleBobbyTables@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I get 8.44 bits (1 in 347.34 browsers). I use Firefox with Arkenfox user.js applied on top, with some of my own custom overrides.

    However, I think the biggest factor could be because I have Ublock Origin set to medium-hard mode (block 1st party scripts, 3rd party scripts and 3rd party iframes by default on all websites), so the lack of JavaScript heavily affects what non-whitelisted websites can track. I did whitelist 1st-party scripts on the main domain for this test (coveryourtracks.eff.org), but all the ‘tracker’ site redirects stay off the whitelist.

    I actually had to allow Ublock Origin to temporarily visit the tracker sites for the test to properly finish–otherwise it gives me a big warning that I’m about to visit a domain on the filter list.

  • LastoftheDinosaurs@walledgarden.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Within our dataset of several hundred thousand visitors tested in the past 45 days, only one in 91389.5 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.

    Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys 16.48 bits of identifying information

    Doesn’t look good. How do you make it so that your browser doesn’t have a fingerprint at all?

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      You can’t not have a finger print. You can a best try and look like everyone elses.Sadly the free market won’t care and as such you won’t blend with normal users. Still you can try and look like ever one else in the privacy community

  • ripley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It seems like the characteristics of my Android tablet doom me here - I was unique even using Chrome.

  • Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I appreciate the site, but what score is considered good or bad? A cool stat would be some kind of score compared to everyone else.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    12.67 from Safari/iPhone, without changing any settings. This is my most commonly used browser

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        …as long as you are blocking tracking cookies, and aren’t on a session with a website that’s tracking you.

        Otherwise, you just have a nice unique hash in your cookies. A password manager could help here.