• drspod@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Oh it’s you, the account that consistently posts beginner-level coding projects as if they are serious tools. The last time I reviewed your code there were security issues that would be obvious to anyone.

    Please stop.

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      As harsh as this sounds, it’s true. I’ve “audited” some of his projects before and found the same massive flaws you have. I tried opening valid issues on one of the projects, hoping to help out (and there sure were a lot of issues), but OP blocked me from opening any issues on any of his projects for “issue spam”, and told me to email him. Many of his posts have been removed for promoting “dubious software”, so I wouldn’t trust these at all. I’ve warned one of the moderators about him before, but I found out that the moderator is inactive.

    • Super_gamer46861@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Its safe against quantum computers, has forward and backward secrecy and everything except encrypted identity keys are stored in RAM for both client and server for maximum privacy

      • transitinoir@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Sounds cool asf, probably the way private messaging apps should be

        Although, it is not really fitting my threat model, I would love to see how it develops

  • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    SimpleX is already good enough. Getting more people to reject anti-libre software would be a far more effective.

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      60 minutes ago

      I agree with the first statement that SimpleX is already good enough, since it’s been heavily audited. As for the second statement, I would like to point out that, rather than shaming some open source software for being “anti-libre”, we should instead at the very least start moving people away from proprietary software, even if that means setting libre software aside for now. Libre software is a radical polar opposite to proprietary software, so it may be hard for people to transition straight to that. Open source software is a good bridge between the two.

  • novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    The more personal messengers there are, the more they are all garaunteed to fail and collapse. Stick with pushing Signal into tue collective public zeitgeist, and once strangers on the street ask if you are on Signa, then we can consider other options.

    Focus on dethroning Whatsapp and shut up about a messenger that 50 people out of 8 billion people have heard of before.