• nahostdeutschland@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 month ago

      Peertube won’t cut it. Those people in the article have thousands of hours of videostreams there. If you’re streaming at 1080p, that will be around 1.5GB of storage per hour. 4k will be worse. So if you have 5000 hours of videos like the one guy in the article, that is a neat 7500GB or 7.5TB of video. There is no instance around that will allow you to save that amount of videos.

      So hosting your own instance would be the only way. Looking at Hetzner storage box, 10TB of data will cost you 25€/month or 300€/years. That is money, but should be possible to pay out of your own pocket.

      • Waryle@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Storing so many videos has a financial and ecological cost. When you reach thousands of hours of videos, it’s time to ask yourself if it’s really useful to keep them all.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I look at a channel like Kitboga and I see immense value in keeping g over a thousand multiple-hours-long videos.

          • taladar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            And what is the immense value in that? Barely anyone will watch any of those videos. For most of those multiple-hour-long videos you can probably count the number of views after the initial week or so (when people watch who didn’t see it live) in the single digits per month if not per year or overall.

        • athairmor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 month ago

          Exactly. When video recording was expensive stuff would get thrown out or overwritten a lot. Films had to be stored in the correct environment, video tapes were expensive and got reused. Stuff was lost that arguably would have some value now. But, the world isn’t going to hell for lack of early films or some episodes of a TV show.

          Nowadays, it’s just too cheap to make videos and the volume has made the average quality go down. We don’t need to hoard Twitch streams and cat videos. Nothing will be lost that will be missed in 50 years. Conserving some might be interesting but it’s not going to impact people’s lives or history all that much.

          • Bilb!@lem.monster
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, I can sort of understand the impulse that everything must be preserved no matter what because we don’t know what will be useful or interesting, but it’s not realistic. Embrace ephemerality! It’s fine!

            • taladar@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 month ago

              Even if you are in favor of preserving “everything”, streamers produce a lot of crap that really is completely useless like a 30 minute start of the archived video that is just an image with a timer ticking down or just a static image.

              • missingno@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 month ago

                Those aren’t typically included in highlights.

                I think what a lot of people are missing here is that this isn’t just raw VODs, those already do expire automatically. But the highlight function was explicitly supposed to be for long-term archival, Twitch told users to highlight anything they want saved, and now that rug is getting pulled out from under them.

                • taladar@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Want to bet it is largely a few idiots who took that to mean “highlight everything” who ruined that for everyone?

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 month ago

    Once again reinforcing the fact that “the cloud” is still someone else’s computer. If you want control over your data, you really need to look into self hosting. Otherwise, don’t be surprised when that someone else decides to change the rules for using their computer. I also can’t help but think that the more the internet matures, the more the version we had in the 90’s makes sense. Web 2.0 was a mistake.

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      The cloud is one of the worst industry terms ever created. Old people still have zero concept and ability to understand how it works. Just had to deal with this with a grandmother who “backed up everything to the cloud before I reset it!”

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    In announcing the change, Twitch cited the “costly” indefinite storage of these highlights, which it says are responsible for “less than 0.1% of hours watched” across the site.

    I don’t know how many hours are watched on Twitch, but I bet it’s so many that 0.1% is still a fuckton of hours.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, maybe. A lot of that is also probably people that put up someone’s 80 hour Minecraft vod on repeat to fall asleep to

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Hours watched != Hours stored.

      Any number of either is going to be huge for Twitch… but this is a no brainer, if a huge chunk of your costs don’t even generate a significant amount of views, muchless actual revenue… yeah it makes sense to stop making storing them.

      You’ve probably got something that looks like the US income distrobution chart, probably evennmore extreme, for # of videos vs # view time, ie:

      Replace the x axis with ‘videos by watchtime percentile’ and the y axis with ‘actual watchtime’.

      So, you draw a horizontal line, everything that doesn’t get above about $150k on this chart is not being watched by enough people to be worth hosting (hosting realtime access to videos for tens of millions of people is very expensive).

      Then, work backwards to figure out a cap for storage that applies to everyone, to be more fair than just outright de-listing videos by low recent view count, which will result in roughly the same amount of no longer provided storage, and allow 2 months for people to save off platform whatever they want, and choose how to trim down their hosted videos on their own.

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Eh. The Internet is too full of useless crap thst costs energy to keep alive. No one needs endless swathes of boring videos. If there are some valuable recordings there, then they can preserve those.

    • Coldmoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I agree in this case but this is what they thought at the dawn of computing, too and we lost a lot of history.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        True but at the dawn of computing we were too naïve. We couldn’t imagine people would record everything.

        • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think the point is that you can’t know what you don’t know. They weren’t naive back then, they were ignorant and limited by the technology of the time.

          We preserve stuff precisely because we don’t know how it might be useful in the future.

          We have a name for things we know for sure won’t be useful in the future: Trash.

          • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes, absolutely, but we also preserve everything because separating the wheat from the chaff is too much work. For example, most people store all the pictures they take because it’s easier than selecting the ones we might want later. But we kmow some of them are useless.

            • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              See but that’s my point. They are useless as far as we can tell in the present.

              Maybe in 2 years we will regret not having mountains of recorded streams when we’re training models for AI streamers. And so on and so forth.

  • B0NK3RS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It sucks but I understand the reasons. Anything of true importance to someone should have been downloaded and/or upload somewhere else as it happens.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    it’s not as easy as it sounds. The hosting on Twitch wasn’t just for videos but for the chat logs synced to that video as well. So you can’t just download the videos and upload them somewhere else you have to download them using Twitch’s shitty tools so that you get the chat as well.

    That takes a lot of time but they only got about a month to do that. And that assumes that one actually has the time, energy, access and expertise to download the stuff. What about disabled streamers? What about families of deceased streamers? They now have a month to figure all this stuff out if they even receive the news at all.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      That is mainly an issue caused by the fact that the whole chat synchronization thing never got developed into an open format since everyone who cared about it was just fine with companies using their own proprietary format for it.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, they chose to stream on a huge company’s website and were entirely content to rely on that company for access to that data, so yes.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Streamers can host it themselves. From what I hear around Lemmy hosting and streaming video is so cheap it can be done without money from ads ;)

  • Ephemer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m surprised Twitch hasn’t done this sooner honestly. Considering some users have tens of thousand of hours worth of 1080p full length streams, I can only imagine how many terrabytes of data these users have been utilizing on their servers.

    This should be a cautionary tale for anyone that relies too much on the cloud. You need to have your own local backups for when, not if, this eventually happens to other cloud providers in the future.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      I once received 1TB free ‘lifetime’ storage from a hoster. After gladly using it for 5 years, I suddenly had to start paying €5 per month because “they could not maintain the operating costs”.

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Attract people with free, then try to charge them when you reach sufficiently large user numbers. Tale as old as the tech bubble.

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well to be honest; the original hoster was amazing. But they got bought by a big hosting group and it turned to shit after that.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ah, the slightly different strategy of offer a great deal to lure in the user count, and then sell it to someone else who will turn on the monetization.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    A hot and uneducated take: nothing of value will be lost. Nobody will ever go searching through a defunct twitch account’s 142 hours of Minecraft speedrun attempts. If it’s valuable, back it up locally

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      nothing of value will be lost

      I’d argue the opposite: there’s actually a lot of stuff out there that’s actually interesting: old-school lets-players who’d have done actual informative playthroughs of games. It’s kind of a dying art, but it’s also exactly the kind of content that’s going to get purged by this kind of action.

      It’s interesting to spend, say, 10 hours watching some guy play Sierra games and actually talk through shit about the game and whatnot, and it’d be a shame to have that vanish.

      But not entirely unexpected since that’s not profitable content in the way that the current morons babbling about bullshit reaction videos, totally-not-camgirls totally not showing their tits, and whatever other brainrot nonsense most of twitch is. (Also alt-right propaganda, but eh.)

    • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think this can be true for large swaths of the information that will be lost, but there’s also a lot that will be lost that nobody is currently backing up. For instance:

      1. Recordings people think are backed up simply because they’re misinformed, only to realize all their old, say, childhood gaming videos are now lost forever
      2. Clips that show damning behavior about a popular public figure that weren’t caught before, but could become evidence in a future investigation
      3. Clips previously thought to not be relevant, that then become relevant later on for some kind of general historical context (e.g. Campaigns started trying to figure out if something was in a game at a given time in a game with very little actual software backed up, devlog streams that contained lost features that could explain why a game then developed the way it is today, etc)
    • chameleon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m particularly worried about all the historical records. Summoning Salt & similar channels are gonna have problems after this, especially after the policy has been in place for several years and stuff made in this very era expires.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if Archive Team tries their best at archiving the current situation (difficult as it is) but nobody is going to bother doing it on-going and a WR obsoleted for months is interesting material only when edited into a documentary.

  • tiramichu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    We have all got very accustomed to the notion that we can put content on a website and it will stay there forever, permanently available, as if that site somehow has an obligation to look after it. But they don’t.

    It sucks, and there will be a lot of stuff lost, but it’s also good to have a reminder that if there’s data you really care about, you need to look after that data yourself.

    • ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      It seems like since my generation had “If you put something on the Internet it’ll be there forever” drilled into us as kids, many of us feel entitled to “the internet” preserving our data for us. Most people don’t realize how much labor and resource usage goes into preserving data forever.

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Did you genuinely interpret that as a child to mean “If you put something on the Internet will be safe forever”?

        As I’m sure you are now aware as an adult, the intended meaning is very much “If you put something on the Internet which is embarrassing to you or damaging to your reputation, then it will be around forever”

        It’s a warning that the things you don’t want to stick around could end up being precisely the things which do.

  • Viri4thus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good, that’s a part of the internet that brought more brainrot than anything.

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well, yes… there’s a lot of brainrot and useless content there, but also a lot of fond memories for people. Not all streamers are made equal. You’re also forcing all the GDQs, esport tournaments and all the individual moments from over the years to find a new hosting source…most likely youtube… whose monopoly we’re also trying to get away from. (at least I hope they can download and upload somewhere else, because if not…)

      • Viri4thus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        1 month ago

        Again, server space and app stores are the new feuds of the modern feudal lord. The sooner all that dies and we can rebuild a decentralised model, the better. It’s a shame for the fond memories, however, how pathetic one’s life has to be that its fond memories are on Twitch surrounded by ads for gfuel and hello fresh…

        • nyctre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          How pathetic does one need to be to only have surface experience of something before they decide to judge it and insult people over enjoying aspects of it… You’re literally wasting your time on the internet belittling someone else’s life… how is that not pathetic?

          • Viri4thus@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 month ago

            Cry me a river. It will still disappear and the overwhelming majority of people won’t miss it. Next time don’t rely on digital feuds to store your fond memories.

            Smash that subscribe button and don’t forget to buy some gfuel using the code imaregard, it will make you more alert and better at your video games. Afterwards you can jump to our friend streamer who’s selling shit to kids from an inflatable pool while wearing only a bikini. Such fond memories.

            • nyctre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              The only one crying here is you, dude. Try to find joy in something less negative, maybe? Forgive whoever hurt you and move on, this is just sad.

              • Viri4thus@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                Lol, twitch is pure cancer, the less of it exists the better. Youtube for all its flaws has redeeming qualities. Twitch is capitalising on primitive voyeurism and is another nail in the coffin of western civilisation. I look forward to the deletion.

                • nyctre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Just… please, stop hating on stuff that doesn’t concern you and focus on spreading positivity, man. That’s what’s gonna make the world a better place. Not hoping that stuff you don’t like and understand will fail. You’re just bringing yourself down.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’ve watched under an hour of twitch streams in my entire life and even I know your opinion is ignorant

              You made up your mind years ago after seeing a couple of shitty streamers. Did you even form the opinion yourself or was it based on a reddit thread?

              • Viri4thus@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’ve watched under an hour of twitch streams in my entire life

                Of course you have…

                • glimse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The only “streamer” I’ve watched is Emily Hopkins playing harp.

                  I’d suggest that you check it out but the community is really nice and I don’t think you’d fit in

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m way more surprised that Twitch even has video storage that old.

    I have streamed a bit, and my videos were limited to one month? Maybe even less.

    Twitch was never meant for video storage, so this move is not unexpected.

    If you want to keep a video, download it, always. Even on Youtube you are not guaranteed to have videos forever. They still have my vid, which is almost 20 years old, nobody watches it… and it’s helping no one.

    Which is to say we need better preservation methods for digital content.

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      VODs do expire automatically, but Twitch has explicitly said in the past that if you want to archive something, highlight it. Highlights WERE meant for storage. So this feels like they’re suddenly reneging on that.

      • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well this is only for accounts with over 100 hours of highlights. If you have more, you either are abusing it or doing this semi seriously and should consider backing up actual highlights.

        Videos are massive and nothing is free. Storage costs. People should backup stiff they care about.

        • missingno@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          My own account was just over the limit and I certainly wasn’t ‘abusing’ it.

          100 hours isn’t nearly as much as you think it is. I’ve just had my account for a long time and the things I wanted to save added up over the years.