Andrew Jassy tells white collar workers that such technology means fewer people will be needed for some jobs

As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done

we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce

Are we done for?

  • Doomsider@lemmy.worldEnglish
    34·
    1 month ago

    It takes a special type of shithead to threaten peoples’ jobs to their face without even knowing what the fuck they are talking about.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.worldEnglish
      10·
      30 days ago

      This is going to be the threat that EVERY employee will hear over the next several years, whenever they ask for any sort of a raise, promotion, etc. “Just be glad we don’t replace you with AI.”

  • andallthat@lemmy.worldEnglish
    12·
    30 days ago

    Quick recap for future historians:

    • for a really brief part of its history, humanity tried to give kindness a go. A half-hearted attempt at best, but there were things like DEI programs, for instance, attempting to create a gentler, more accepting world for everyone. At the very least, trying to appear human to the people they managed was seen as a good attribute for Leaders.

    • some people felt that their God-given right to be assholes to everyone was being taken away (it’s right there in the Bible: be a jerk to your neighbor, take away his job and f##k his wife)

    • Assholes came back in full force, with a vengeance. Not that they had ever disappeared, but now they relished the opportunity to be openly mean for no reason again. Once again, True Leaders were judged by their ability to drain every drop of blood from their employees and take their still-beating hearts as an offering to the Almighty Shareholders.

  • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    4·
    1 month ago

    Did someone tell Amazon that some of the staff they will let go will have access to AI as well and will turn around and start competing with them? Someone should as AI is not just for corporations. In fact it is and may continue to benefit individuals and small teams more.

  • anachrohack@lemmy.worldEnglish
    37·
    1 month ago

    The people who are predicting that AI will replace X% of jobs are usually not qualified to make that determination. They don’t do those jobs, and they don’t have any idea what is involved in those peoples jobs. They are way too high up the corporate ladder to have actually been doing any real work in the last 10 years. They were sold some AI product which promises to lay off thousands of workers, and they seem to have believed it implicitly.

    What’s sickening to me is how enthusiastic they seem to be about ruining their employees lives

    • lando55@lemmy.worldEnglish
      101·
      1 month ago

      Ironically, save for specific positions that require facetime and political shrewdness, it is these same prognosticators whose roles can most readily be fulfilled by Ai

  • vane@lemmy.worldEnglish
    12·
    1 month ago

    Ah yes those famous “Agents”. They will of course write themselves, adapt themselves to changing environment and run on their own without any supervision.

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.comEnglish
      1·
      30 days ago

      And if all that were to happen. You just caused eventual iron man uprising due to lack of supervision on code updates.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zipEnglish
      2·
      30 days ago

      Yes. Exactly. They’ll also deploy upgrades to themselves painlessly. Thankfully that’s never been a huge ongoing pain felt by everyone paying attention.

      (I couldn’t resisit adding a “yes, and” to your point.

      Edit: And the AI agents will back themselves up correctly, too! We trained them on the activities of all currently living IT engineers, and the average of our work always results in a successful backup…

      If that wasn’t true, we would be having a new ransomware crisis every month…

      I’m sure glad we live in one of the good timelines, and have plenty of clean correct code and configuration data to train our AI on!

      (This is, of course, sarcasm. Companies that shift to AI IT agents today can expect to very quickly reach today’s median IT outcome. There’s not enough popcorn in the world for what is coming.)

  • Kowowow@lemmy.caEnglish
    19·
    1 month ago

    Something I think should be on the same level as “if buying isn’t owning piracy isn’t theft” is something like “if an ai/robot can take my job why should I have to work”

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pubEnglish
      1·
      1 month ago

      why should I have to work

      Because landlords would like to keep their wealth extraction going.

      In theory we could get solar panels and batteries for power, some cheap robots for growing food, but all land is owned.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.socialEnglish
    251·
    1 month ago

    Nice of him to give them the heads up, so they can all go find new jobs now. Sure would be poetic if they all just moved elsewhere and left Amazon understaffed.

  • SparrowHawk@feddit.itEnglish
    281·
    1 month ago

    yes, create a legion of angry, unemployed/unemployable people, that will go well for the capitalist system