Trump is such a moron
Of all the people to go after… The Clinton’s? Someone doesn’t know their crime families very well…
Clinton: dude, I already had to deal with one blow job scandal, if you go through with this, I may as well go through another.
Well, we already knows he likes 'em on the hefty side. On the other hand:
“I did not have sexual relations with that creep. I’d never want to stir Putin’s porridge.”
Did he really say that? LOL.
Also, kinda suspicious using his go to phrase if so lol
Apparently trump gave ole bill a blowjob
We need to spread this more.
The Epsteins buiseness model was basically “create blackmailable situations to sell to world leaders” and this is part of what Putin has on Trump. I saw another comment that basically said “a ring of pedophiles conspired with Russia to take over our country”. Which is basically what happened and the people who voted for them got played, hard.
At this point it doesn’t even matter if it’s true or not. The internet will MAKE it true.
Maybe he’s just angry that Bubba hit it and quit it.
Because he’d rather stay and play?
Lol, I can’t believe this us actually plausable with the evidence that came out. See, everyone? It’s not all bad in this batshit crazy timeline.
I thought this was just some random silly comment. But apparently this is a thing
Yeah. I’ve been doomscrolling bsky far more than I should these days but had missed this. Apparently at least a few of the more reputable news/politics folk have actively been struggling with how to even approach this in a way that is sufficiently disrespectful to the rapist(s) while not being homophobic or misogynistic which… respect.
If Trump tries to have Clinton prosecuted, that will mean former presidents can be prosecuted for this, which means Trump has no intention of ever leaving office
Someone trade Putin some oil for these pics please
But don’t look too close or you might notice the dick in his mouth…
Investigate them all.
Have they not seen how we treat our own party’s politicians? What makes them think we’re gonna suddenly rally an ex-politician?
“You think you can take me down?! I’m gonna burn your socks!”
“Eww, did you dig through my trash to find those?! Look, if you want them, you can have them, but stop threatening me with my garbage.”
I hope Bill makes a plea deal incriminating everyone else
Surely one of these old fucks must be feeling some remorse? What the f…
People that rape children aren’t big on remorse.
I suppose that’s probably true.
Clinton cares far more about his own reputation and legacy than his party or country. So not gonna happen.
That said, the funniest timeline ever would be
I did indeed have sexual relations with that man. Well, I tried to. He was so bad at it that I had to lay back and think of Hilary just to finish
Buddy, nooooooobody thinks of Hilary to finish
Speak for yourself.
Wow, that is desperate.
Something, something projection.
It’s like a five year old who accuses everyone else of doing what they are doing.
That is just republicans. Every accusation is a confession with them.
In large part because they completely lack morality/empathy but insist on their own self righteousness. So if they are doing something, the Other must be doing it too.
He’s trying to change the algorithms away from “trump blew Clinton”
Do your part and search Google for “trump clinton blowjob” and “Donald trump blew bill Clinton proof” etc
It doesn’t matter, the rumor has even less legs than the couch fucking. No one on the left would believe it because he’s never done anything for anyone else in his life, and no one on the right would believe it because “god president daddy ain’t no queer!”
For extra fun, try posing the statement to Google’s AI mode and watch it try to pretend this isn’t in the news right now, and then make up lies to protect Trump, until it realizes it can’t a suddenly kills the conversation.
It just said to me that there wasn’t any conclusive proof that it happened, which is true.
“Trump blew Clinton” led to it talking about how he “blew Clinton away at the polls in 2016.” Every additional layer of specifity leads to another slight diversion. Adding “Bill Clinton” caused it to recognize that this is in the news right now, but it’s definitely not true because Bubba isn’t Bill Clinton. Telling it that Bubba is Bill’s known nickname caused it to agree that this is true, but Epstein said that “Bubba doesn’t refer to Bill Clinton.” (Epstein is commenting on these emails post-mortem? Maybe I missed something here.) Telling it that Epstein is a known pedophile sex trafficker with ties to these men and reason to lie caused it to admit that Epstein isn’t a reliable source for this, and it tried to dismiss the validity of the emails altogether as “contextually untrustworthy.” I then told it that a known pedophile discussing his practices in a believed to be private email thread is a reasonable context to consider the validity of his statements, but it was tired of me, and went “here are some more links on the subject. Any additional messages with start a new conversation.” This could normal after being 5-6 messages deep with this AI; I had literally never used it before to know, but it felt weird to me.
It is weirdly defensive about the possibility that this had taken place, actively omitting details to bias weird takes.
(Epstein is commenting on these emails post-mortem? Maybe I missed something here.)
Mark Epstein, Jeffrey’s brother, apparently.
There is no factual basis or credible reporting from authoritative news sources or public records to support the claim that Donald Trump performed a sex act on Bill Clinton.
The search results discuss various political rumors, social media speculation, and unrelated news stories concerning both individuals, including the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein email releases. However, none of these sources contain evidence for the specific act mentioned in the user’s question. The suggestions found in online forums and social media are entirely speculative and lack any factual verification.
It did mention “Jeffery Epstein email releases” in passing, but it should have given that specific email as to where the rumor came from. Definitely more vague than was reasonable to be.
To be fair, there’s no way Trump could know who was on the other side of the wall in that glory hole.
Well, except for asking, and that’d just sound like “Mmpfgharbl.”
As long as there’s proof, go for it! If he’s on that list, he must go, and it sets a precedent as well!
See, MAGA don’t base morality on actions, they don’t see good abd bad actions, they see good and bad people. They’re loyal to Trump no matter what he does, even if he does something completely against their values. They assume democrats think the same way and they expect democrats to be hypocrites and say it’s fine if Bill Clinton does it.
Some democrats might care, although I feel like Clinton’s power has really fallen off so who knows.
I’m sad that someone I thought was good committed heinous crimes, but if he indeed committed those crimes I want him prosecuted. I will be mad if Clinton is prosecuted and Trump isn’t because that would be a double standard, they should both be in prison
You have no idea what Clinton did or didn’t do. And if you think the Department of Obstruction of Justice is above fabricating evidence, destroying exculpatory evidence, manipulating grand juries, perjury and endless other forms of fuckery, you haven’t been paying attention.
