Volodymyr Zelensky, in the next phase of talks to end the war in Ukraine, intends to draw a red line at the most contentious issue on the table: the Russian demand for Ukraine’s sovereign territory. As long as he remains the nation’s president, Zelensky will not agree to give up land in exchange for peace, Ukraine’s chief negotiator, Andriy Yermak, told me today in an exclusive interview.

“Not a single sane person today would sign a document to give up territory,” said Yermak, who has served as Zelensky’s chief of staff, lead negotiator, and closest aide throughout the full-scale war with Russia.

“As long as Zelensky is president, no one should count on us giving up territory. He will not sign away territory,” he told me by telephone from Kyiv. “The constitution prohibits this. Nobody can do that unless they want to go against the Ukrainian constitution and the Ukrainian people.”

https://archive.ph/HaMwP

  • Gary Ghost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Russia will come back and take it all, don’t give them an edge. Trump will be on TV whining how Ukraine rejected his really good peace offering.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      they waited til the right time to take crimea, its almost always a dem president in office before he struck, he miscalculated with ukraine. its the same reason gop ruins the economy, they get blaming points, in this case crimea, ukraine so the reps get re-elected once again, and give russia pass when they are back in power.

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is no scenario in which Russia gives up control of Crimea. It is simply too strategically important.

        • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Is there any serious analysis that anticipates that? I mean, a flurry of meteor strikes could also do it, I suppose.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes. Their oil production is way down due to the destruction of a lot of their refineries so fuel supplies are running low. They are also unable to produce enough amination for their tanks. So their tanks won’t go and can’t fire, hard to call that winning.

            • freagle@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              They lost a few percentage points of total refining capacity.

              The strikes Ukraine made did disrupt a large percentage of the refineries, that’s true. But the strikes didn’t do a lot of damage and the refineries were brought back onine shortly.

              The total annual production of those refineries was affected. But only something like 3% - 6%.

              • Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                This week there are reports, plus lots of corroborating videos showing orcs running into battle without helmets or armor. They don’t seem to be doing great.

                • freagle@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  And yet Ukraine can’t seem to defend against them? Russian territory gains have been accelerating over the last 4 weeks. Pretty bad situation if Ukraine can’t defend against unarmored and unarmed soldiers

  • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Given that Europe has had 4 years to start cranking up its military power and has failed to do so meaningfully, and the US looks like a vassal state of Russia at the moment, I feel this may become an inevitability if Europeans don’t stop bickering about where exactly gets to make what, and starts actually making things, like with the 2 modern fighter projects (as Europe cannot make its own 5th yet alone 6th gen fighters), or the joint European (France and Germany mainly) tank project.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You might want to look into that because Europe absolutely is ramping up its military response.

      • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        What part about mentioning 3 specific projects as examples of where Europe is not doing enough makes you think that I am not aware of their efforts?

        I am specifically saying those efforts are not enough nor are they soon enough.

    • Aljernon@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’re statement would have had more truth to it in 2023 then it does today. Europe is still behind Russia in that regard but Russia committed to fully switching to a wartime economy.

      • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Just to be clear, your point and argument, are that I am correct, but I am wrong because exactly as I mentioned, Europe could have done better if they bolstered their defences and prepared?

        It feels like you’ve just taken my comment as an attack on Europe, but have no real criticisms of my points.

        My statement would be less true, not more true in 2023, because the point is, the longer they go without having done so, the more dire the situation becomes.

    • aarch0x40@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Russia’s showing signs of desperation anyhow which is why they’re trying to push through an agreement.  They can’t debase the currency much further, they don’t have the reserves or the GDP.  Ukraine is in more the position strength here as they’ve spend their time building alliances which has been aided by Russian actions strengthening the resolve of Europeans.

        • redlemace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago
          • In 1994, the United States, Russia, and Ukraine signed the Trilateral Statement, under which Ukraine committed to eliminate all nuclear weapons on its territory and join the NPT, in exchange for economic support and security assurances from the United States and Russia.

          Yeah, would have been nice if the word (signature in fact!) of us government had meant anything (we knew russia never lives up to it)

          • jumjummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            3 days ago

            Unfortunately, this is just a stark lesson for any other country out there. Do not give up your nuclear weapons no matter what “guarantees” you get.

            • plyth@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              and security assurances from the United States and Russia.

              The US pressured Ukraine to accept assurances and not guarantees. It matters which kind of guarantees are given.

          • MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sounds like the EU needs a nuclear weapon program. At least one warhead in every EU nation, and at least 10 in every bordering Russia.

            And also an autonomous weapon program. Like Project Manhatthan, but for Skynet.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        Ah yes, but with Trump bending over backwards to accommodate Putin the Russians needn’t worry.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        so many of thier fuel stations are hit, its going to start affecting his 2 base of influence, moscow and st.pete, the last thing he wants is those people in the cities complaining,.

      • joostjakob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If they really felt desperate, wouldn’t they show just a bit more flexibility in their demands?

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    If Russia offered back the nuclear weapons Ukraine gave them in the 90s, maybe Ukraine would cede land in exchange.