• angrytoadnoises@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I did not expect this thing to actually be hauled to shore. Kind of thought they were just going to leave it. How much did it cost to pull that thing up?

    • maporita@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hopefully, examination of the wreckage will yield valuable information about the cause of the failure and help future designs of deep-sea submersibles.

        • stealthnerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure we do but there’s always something to be learned from a failure. This sub was unique in it’s design and while that design ultimately failed, the knowledge gained from the failure could potentially lead to an improved design that maintains some of the benefits such as low cost and high occupancy.

          • Nogami@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            Also when carbon fibre is used on other applications such as in planes and such. There is always something to be learned about failure modes which can be used to make future applications safer.

            For instance, in this case where exactly did the failure point happen? Was it at at the bonding area, one of the end caps, or in the middle of the tube, etc.

  • 「fleece!」@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is haunting.

    There’s no gore or anything, it’s just twisted metal and cables. Still, seeing it and thinking “humans were alive in there mere days ago” made my gut drop. It’s not like looking at wreckage of an old ship or plane or something, it’s different. Because it’s so small, it feels more intimate. Like looking at a coffin vs looking at a graveyard

  • mook@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting - I had imagined it being imploded into bits like the simulations on the news show.

    • cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m certainly no expert but I understand submarines have an inner and outer hull. The inner hull has to withstand the pressure of the deep but the outer hull does not. The inner hull would be crushed into bits but the outer hull and any equipment in-between would likely be ripped into large chunks as such a violent event occurs inside of it.

      • Nogami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Subs have dual hulls so they can fill the void between them with water to sink, or air to float, but they don’t dive anywhere near as deep. Most regular naval subs operate above 800 meters. They only have to be below the surface of the water for stealth, not at the bottom of the ocean.

        This craft was a single hull design as far as I’m aware, designed with a rigid hull to try and counteract the pressure at the bottom.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow I didn’t know they were going to recover it at all. Pretty cool. Can’t wait to read about how shitty the design was.