

The fact that you linked 3 links that don’t counter what I said is impressive.


The fact that you linked 3 links that don’t counter what I said is impressive.


You can’t form a corporation without their expressed permission, if not, you loose your status as a corporation.
This is just wrong. It’s not permission. You submit to their bureaucracy, yes, but that’s guaranteed if you submit your paperwork correctly, it’s not a permission.
Capitalism ≠ Laissez-faire free markets, but government owning the rights on who gets to issue bonds and debts.
This is not completely accurate. It implies it’s a prior approval situation instead of a post-revocable situation which while similar are notably different. The government cannot revoke those privileges arbitrarily. There is rules for them, but those rules do not restrict who does so, they restrict how it’s done.
Speaking broadly, a system where the king issues money, and controls said money, is not capitalism anymore than socialism is communism. When nobility exist and can arbitrarily set rules and taxes, that is not capitalism. That isn’t to say either are good, they’re both terrible systems. But the thing you described with a king is strictly not capitalism, it’s a different evil.
Treating the disease rather than the symptoms is better.


Using some of the wifi connection tricks companies have, it can probably associate the device with all the devices your family has and the corresponding data


Yes,
Capitalism without copyright…
Capitalism is the issue. Not copyright. Why do you think copyright is causing the problems that capitalism is causing.
You merge or sue your competition to death for copyright violations first…
A nonsense statement when said in reply to what I said.
And that attitude gets people telling me “oh, you’ll love my dog!” When you actually genuinely. do not like dogs. It’s a pain.


That’s a different conversation. You’re redirecting. My statement was as to that copyright is not necessary for large corporations. I’m still anti corpo. Without copyright large businesses would be the primary beneficiaries. They’d be able to freely do as china’s factories do. They’d simply undercut the original inventers with their massive wealth, making the products cheaper(and often worse), selling more and amassing more money for themselves.


Large corporations predate copyright, including the west india trading company. So yes, it is strictly untrue. Not all business relies on copyright and patents to run.


Importing wage slaves ❤️❤️❤️


Yes, I too love allowing large corporations to steal from independent artists and use their larger resources to take market share and all of the profit
Once they win elections, it’s already too late.
Hey what do you think stops them from winning that first election?


Yeah tell me how that would’ve worked/ is working for Ukraine.


Russia would be the other option that Canada needs to keep in mind.


Focusing on only a single country is, simply put, stupid.


It’s far more pathetic to set a deadline for your boycott than to buy something on black friday. You think your boycott has a meaning if you’re that sad about it?
I’ve been boycotting all big companies for a year nonstop and your group can barely do it for a week before crying and just buying anyways


No one did.
A third of America voted for this. More realistically closer to 2/3 because everyone who didn’t vote is complicit in electing trump


Mandatory service is not a problem. As long as we live in a world with countries like russia mandatory service does more good than harm.


That’s not how finding jobs work. You can’t just magically get a better one, much less in this economy. Instead, they should unionize collectively and fight Amazon for better pay
Humanity is on a hard fought, slow, and with many setbacks, trend towards a better world. Evil is pushed out by good but not without the blood, sweat, and tears of many good people.