Thank you for digging up the original! The AI version is flagrant plagiarism and should be deleted.
- 30 Posts
- 34 Comments
erlend_sh@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Donald Trump would have been convicted over 2020 election, special counsel report says1·5 个月前I need this on a t-shirt.
As of today it’s basically an open alternative to linktree. Read our blog posts for more about the big picture plans.
erlend_sh@lemmy.worldto Fediverse@lemmy.world•A Case for Modernizing Lemmy's Default UI with PhotonEnglish2·6 个月前I suggested the official adoption of Photon a year ago. Xylight was tentatively on board with it.
Even more important though is this change which would allow an alternative frontend to be used as a default, instead of having to be relegated to a sub-domain.
erlend_sh@lemmy.worldOPto Fediverse@lemmy.world•"Correct Fediverse" – Capabilities & Identity with LeafEnglish1·7 个月前Haha exactly!
Would love to hear about it when it’s out!
erlend_sh@lemmy.worldto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Shouldn't all ActivityPub servers implement all objects and leave it to the client?English5·7 个月前That sounds really interesting! We’re building an OIDC server for indies with Weird – please feel free to come by and chat with us: https://blog.muni.town/muni-town/
erlend_sh@lemmy.worldto Fediverse@lemmy.world•"Backup" your fedi account, when not self hosting?English7·7 个月前I’m aware of this library for it: https://github.com/kensanata/mastodon-archive
Dunno about any easy button-click service for it though, which is why we’re building it into Weird, which is like a CMS for your digital identity.
erlend_sh@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Norwegian government to set 15-year age limit for using social mediaEnglish414·8 个月前Exactly!
It’s not about Totalizing Enforcement. What it changes is the cultural norm. Not right away but over time.
An age limit on alcohol never stopped anyone of any age to acquire alcohol, but it sets the societal bar for what’s acceptable. You don’t wanna be the parents that gave your kids alcoholic beverages at 13.
It’s always a little jarring how everyone very readily believes that the Scandinavian countries are the happiest in the world, but won’t believe that the incremental policy changes we implement here have any effect 🤷♂️
erlend_sh@lemmy.worldto politics @lemmy.world•Trump biopic 'The Apprentice' hits theaters amid fury from his campaign1·8 个月前Haven’t seen the movie yet (guess I’ll have to now), but I imagine it’s a good pairing with this: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7193362/
erlend_sh@lemmy.worldOPto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Holy Hell, The Social Web Did Not Begin In 2008English192·9 个月前His point is there is no one protocol for the social web. The (open) social web is built on a pluriverse of protocols, like rss, email, irc, matrix, activitypub, atproto…
erlend_sh@lemmy.worldOPto Fediverse@lemmy.world•How Lemmy could interop with Mastodon, as imagined in Frontpage + BlueskyEnglish10·9 个月前One thing that seems to go unappreciated in the comments is the simplicity of this interop proposal: It is essentially about enabling quote-posting of link-aggregator(Groups) posts.
Bluesky + Frontpage will work this way, and I believe it’ll work exceedingly well. If the ap-net corner of the fediverse isn’t interested in this kind of interop, fair enough. To me however the promise of seamless interop between my social apps was what brought me to the fediverse, so that’s the version of the fediverse I will pursue.
Yeah I get that. What ‘works’ means in the context of local-first is flexible though. This might provide a useful framing: https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2023/offline-is-online-with-extreme-latency/
In any case, you’re definitely right to focus on your specific use case first without trying to fit it into any specific paradigm. I’m excited to follow Habitat’s progress!
This sounds great!
Are you familiar with the local-first tenets? Seems like a natural fit for the local nature of your app:
This is certainly not spam but rather a blog response, a time honored practice as old as blogging itself.
OP’s article links to the source article (albeit via its fedipost rather than its blog post; maybe best to link both) and contributes to the online discourse with a long form reply, detailing a possible solution.
Mischaracterizing such a clearly well-intentioned contribution as “blog spam” is disingenuous.
edit: thanks for retracting your comment. I hope my retort won’t dissuade you from continuing to engage in this community :)
erlend_sh@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Young people becoming less happy than older generations, research shows4·1 年前Big Social Media shares many characteristics of a drug, with similar anti-social consequences by overuse. But as with drugs, social media is just a symptom of the underlying problem.
It will still have made the rounds, since it trended on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39667026
I’m surprised these images make it so high up on Lemmy when this place is (rightly) so culturally opposed to the stuff.