Nutomic@lemmy.ml to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 1 年前Announcing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternativeibis.wikiexternal-linkmessage-square297linkfedilinkarrow-up1518arrow-down140cross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.world
arrow-up1478arrow-down1external-linkAnnouncing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternativeibis.wikiNutomic@lemmy.ml to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 1 年前message-square297linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.world
minus-squareRolder@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 年前I’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. Got any current examples?
minus-squareRolder@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 年前Never heard of any examples and certainly no one has provided any in this thread. Just been the usual muh western website is evil by default kind of stuff.
I’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. Got any current examples?
Removed by mod
Never heard of any examples and certainly no one has provided any in this thread. Just been the usual muh western website is evil by default kind of stuff.