Sorry for the super sporadic posting. Still in the process of moving and everything. I am giving updates on my Mastodon and [email protected] if anyone is interested but there’s really no reason to be.

Hope everyone has a fantastic Friday. Live long and prosper, you glorious bastards.

    • fubarx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Guessing QA test script does not specify which port to plug the ethernet cable into. So they choose whichever is closest to their dominant hand.

    • Tyfud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve posted this before, but that protective boot is optional and not a part of the standard.

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Probably because no one in there was using ethernet cables with snag protectors to design or test.

      In fairness, if this was targeted to medium-large corporates they would expect to be using manually terminated cables which don’t have that feature.

      I’m sure someone added that type cable to the testing procedure after this though.

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      QA budget has been gutted. They can’t afford the Bougie Ethernet Cables that come with boots.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yea, either Cisco has shit processes that don’t involve multiple checks after drawings are first made, or multiple people fucked up in checking.