• Ethan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sure. But in a sane language doing something totally nonsensical like that is an error, and in a statically typed language it’s a compiler error. It doesn’t just silently do weird shit.

      • Ethan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I thought it was clear I was saying JavaScript is not a sane language for this very reason

      • Lime66@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Any of them which are still strongly typed. Just because a language doesn’t check for type errors before runtime doesn’t mean it won’t check at all

      • Ethan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I was trying to make a point without starting a flamewar that was beside the point. Personally I’d never choose a dynamically typed language for a production system. That being said, Python and Ruby complain if you try to add an array, dict/hashmap, string, or number to another (of a different type) so they’re certainly more sane than JavaScript.