• suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    I use BD-R for archival storage of important files. They’re cheaper and easier than tape as well as small. I burn them in triplicate and throw them in the same case and as long as the same 3 bits don’t corrupt I can recover. The shelf life on a blue ray sealed and stored well is a few decades which is better than most other media.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I understand that from a business perspective, but I’m having a hard time rationalizing it for personal use.

      I guess, if you’re doing a lot of video editing and you want to preserve a large personal library? Idk.

      • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s mostly family photos and videos. I’ve become the de facto family digital archivist. Some digital copies of important phyiscal records. When you convert files to lossless/uncompressed formats suitable for long term storage they get large really quickly.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Where are you buying your Blu-rays? Every time I’ve looked into burnable BD-Rs they’ve been more expensive per gigabyte than a 3.5" SATA hard drive (which has the bonus of better data longevity and being rewritable).