Hear me out, the mascot is a freaking chameleon, that’s cool as shit man.

Also it’s a German engineered distro, German engineering wins again!

Zypper is just a funnier name for a package manager and it has Tumbleweed which is arch but actually doesn’t break for once!

Your rebuttal?

  • Jure Repinc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yup I agree, openSUSE Tumbleweed with KDE Plasma desktop is just awesome. my favourite distro at this moment,

  • Ramin Honary@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Never tried it, but everyone I know who has tried it says its the most stable rolling release OS ever. That is pretty cool. Btrfs support is cool too, copy-on-write, deduplication, and whole-disk snapshot and rollback capability, its great for keeping your data safe.

    I don't care about rolling releases, I get my stability from Debian, or sometimes Mint. If I want the latest software I’ll install Guix packages or FlatPaks. And I can still use Btrfs on Debian.

    • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I used both tumbleweed and leap for a bit and they really are good. I’m actually using tumbleweed on a home server right now and it’s been a champ. But…

      1. My biggest gripe is opensuse seems to use different package names than any of the other distros for basic packages. I had to install a package that used capitals in the package name, and coming from mostly debian based distros, that made me rationally angry when trying to find the package I needed. I think it was network-manager or something that’s usually installed by default and I wanted something familiar.

      2. Online directions for setting something up usually has deb and/or fedora rpm directions, which is usually just some difference in package names and the equivalent install command, searching the base package will let you figure it out. I had very few issues following debian/Ubuntu directions and translating them for fedora. Opensuse is always non-existent so you always need to translate those directions for opensuse, which is usually like doing it for fedora until you run into point (1).

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I agree that (1) is particularly painful on openSUSE, because of (2), and I do agree that Fedora tends to be more similar to Debian/Ubuntu, but package names differing between distros is pretty universal for any non-derivative distros.

        For example, I tried to use nix-shell, which basically lets you set up a small, reproducible build environment using packages from NixOS. And it was working excellently, except I could not figure out for the life of me, what the names of the NixOS packages are that provide certain C libraries…

  • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Got to admit, the zypper argument is compelling.

    “zypper up”! is the best upgrade command.

    • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re forgetting that pacman can show a little pacman as the loading bar. Also I’m always happy to run updates so typing “yay” into my terminal just feels right.

    • bsergay@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Arch does not just randomly break

      You might be right. However, the experiences of my own and many others seem to ‘contradict’ this.

      FWIW, I’ve run Arch and EndeavourOS in the past. And, for some reason, (seemingly) entirely out of the blue, it just stopped booting. I put in some effort with troubleshooting. But, at some point, I just got tired and/or didn’t ever want to deal with this anymore and left it for what it is. I’ve left Arch behind me ever since.

      To be fair, I’ve had a similar experience with Nobara. So, this is not necessarily an ‘Arch-thing’. However, a significant part of the community has experienced similar issues on non-stable distros (i.e. distros that don’t have a slow release cycle).

      While I’d be the first to admit that this is (perhaps) merely a skill issue, the fact of the matter is that similar experiences on other OSes are practically non-existent. Hence, it’s a hard sell to someone that has enjoyed ‘stability’ in the past.

  • Matt@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    openSUSE also remains one of the only distributions that have automatic Btrfs snapshots setup out of the box. I am very surprised other distributions have not done the same. Especially Fedora, since they use Btrfs already.

    • bsergay@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      IIRC, it was related to Fedora Atomic. Out of the box, Fedora Atomic offers functionality that’s very close to what you’d expect from Btrfs snapshots. It doesn’t use Snapper, but instead relies on (rpm-)ostree; at least, that’s my understanding of it. So, in order to make Fedora Atomic more palatable and attractive, this feature was not directly built into Fedora. Furthermore, I wouldn’t be surprised if ‘politics’ play a role in this; Snapper is kinda like openSUSE’s project. While Fedora Atomic’s implementation is Fedora’s take. Unfortunately, it happens to be (by design) not available on traditional Fedora.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I worked on a SuSE-derived Linux back in the day.

    What we agreed we’d be getting: a working product ready for customization an extension as required. What we got: a corpse with the skin and organs removed, effectively kicked out of a van at our doorstep before it drove off.

    It’s not that the packaging was bad - it was - but that the environment in and relations outside the organization were terrible. As it impacted our work and probably impacted their quality long-term, I’ve avoided it since.

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What’s your recommendation for distro? Not arch or fedora please, bad experience with updates, both system broke almost always because i install a lot of software, so far only Debian worked good for me, but i want rolling release, maybe Debian sid gonna work for me, I’ve thinked of tubleweed recently but seeing your comment it got me thinking again

      • bsergay@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not the person you asked, but wanted to offer my 2 cents.

        So you want rolling release, with lots of software installed and it should not break.

        • openSUSE Tumbleweed indeed seems like a logical fit.
        • If you’re fine with smaller projects, you could perhaps also consider
          • Garuda Linux: Arch-based with Btrfs snapshots and Snapper; similar to what openSUSE Tumbleweed utilizes
          • Siduction/SpiralLinux: both based on Debian’s rolling release; also with Btrfs snapshots and Snapper
        • If you’re okay with ‘immutable’ distros, consider the following
          • Fedora Atomic: current gold standard; the uBlue images specifically allow a very smooth transition
          • NixOS: more ‘powerful’ than Fedora Atomic, but ridiculous learning curve
          • blendOS: Arch-based. Small community and has only recently left alpha phase
        • Toribor@corndog.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Bazzite has finally got me to pay attention to Fedora derivatives again for the first time in like 15 years.

          • bsergay@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Granted; Fedora has always had relatively few derivatives. The same applies to openSUSE. While popularity definitely plays a role in this, there’s more going on in the background that’s out of scope for what this comment intends.

            But yeah, Bazzite is excellent. And so is Aurora, Bluefin, secureblue and many more.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      I would say zypper up is the better command, just because it’s kinda funny. pacman is better overall, but it gets less fun when you start adding arguments like -Syu, if only because it’s a “language” you have to learn and isn’t self-documenting in any way.

      • pixeled@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Haha, zypper up is a nice one, didn’t know that.

        Pacman gets huge bonus points though for having a config option to turn to progress bar shown during package installation into a ‘pacman’ (letter c) chomping from left to right :)

        (done by adding ILoveCandy under the Misc options in /etc/pacman.conf)

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yeah, that’s the first distro that I use in a long time (last time before that I was running some early version of Ubuntu MATE), and having a blast already. I also very like customizability of KDE Plasma 6.

    • bsergay@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I would normally 100% agree with you. But if it’s an underrated distro, then I tend to be more lean on this. However, I agree that OP should have done a better job at ‘advertising’ openSUSE. For example; not mentioning YaST is just criminal.

    • HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      This post seems lighthearted and not mean-spirited. I do wish they said “awesome” or “great” instead of “the best,” but they’re not trashing other distros and it is relevant so I don’t see the problem.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        At least it’s those positive things. From the influx of newcomers here, I just hate that they see posts like this before than can objectively see the field for the trees.

        If this entire sub becomes “OMG THIS IS THE BEST”, it’s going to be nothing but noise real fucking fast.

      • Tekkip20@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        That person should take a break, I’m just jostling you know, bit of tomfoolery and joking around.

        It’s almost like some people like that user should eat some snickers and read a book on bunny rabbits or something

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ll concede that the logo is good but I found the package manager confusing. Also I like compiling packages from source so only a couple of distros allow me to fully dive into that. It’s Gentoo for me, I’m afraid.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I always find it interesting, when people claim they don’t like Arch, because it breaks, supposedly.

    Out of genuine curiosity, what did you find, that kept breaking, that wasn’t user error, and wasn’t easily reparable?

  • Dremor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why the fuck does it ask for root password to change every little thing? Want to change network password? Root password. Install a flatpak? Root password. Sneeze? You guessed it, root password.

    I’d be using it instead of Fedora if it wasn’t for that shit. I even tried to spin myself a custom OpenSuse ISO…

    • xinayder@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The default config for sudo is to ask for root password. I too was annoyed by this and had to change the setting to ask for the user password, not root, every time I used sudo.

    • ProtonBadger@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It might be a bit tighter than Fedora, I haven’t tried Fedora so I wouldn’t know but Flatpaks can still be installed as user, no pw. All mine are, by default.

      • Dremor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        But you still need to add the remote… With a root password of course. At least last time I tried.

          • Dremor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Probably trough the commandline, it has been a long time since I last checked, but not using the gui, which asked for the password for any repository modification.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not a fan of the chameleon, but I do like the branding on the other versions, like MicroOS. Looks like runes or Unown pokemon.