simple@lemm.ee to Funny@sh.itjust.works · edit-24 months agoUser returns after 100k-hours ban to continue conversation that got them banned in the first place.www.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1324arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1319arrow-down1external-linkUser returns after 100k-hours ban to continue conversation that got them banned in the first place.www.pcgamer.comsimple@lemm.ee to Funny@sh.itjust.works · edit-24 months agomessage-square31fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareatrielienz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down12·4 months agoI admire the dedication. Seems like a waste of time though. The account they were arguing with probably isn’t even still in use. And even if it is, the argument probably isn’t worth it.
minus-squareabracaDavid@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoIsn’t all of this just a big waste of time though?
minus-squareBearOfaTime@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up41·4 months agoWaste of time? He put it in his calendar for a reminder 11 years in the future. Spent 5 minutes logging in and typing up his response. Now we all benefit from it!
minus-squareTwitches@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up58·4 months agoThe article said he’s basically only doing it for comedic purposes. It is funny.
I admire the dedication. Seems like a waste of time though. The account they were arguing with probably isn’t even still in use. And even if it is, the argument probably isn’t worth it.
Isn’t all of this just a big waste of time though?
Probably.
Waste of time?
He put it in his calendar for a reminder 11 years in the future.
Spent 5 minutes logging in and typing up his response.
Now we all benefit from it!
👆
ez win
The article said he’s basically only doing it for comedic purposes. It is funny.