• Shard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well at least she admitted to it.

    I’ve not come across an in-universe explanation that made sense seeing as its always been “time travel dangerous.”

    Considering the numbers that have died directly and indirectly because of the whole Voldemort thing, a single person sacrifice doesn’t seem all that bad.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      a single person sacrifice doesn’t seem all that bad.

      What could it cost?

      A whole phenomenon of a series!

      Assuming Voldemort’s rise didn’t somehow prevent an even more evil wizard from coming to power, or in the timeline without him Arthur Weasley had too much time on his hands and started messing with nukes…

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      Also, if it’s so dangerous, what adult in their right mind would give a time turner to a child so she can follow more classes? She’ll still literally age the same, spend the same time in school. Just have her take more years at school of age wants to learn more, instead of giving one of the most dangerous items ever to a child so she can use it to literally be in the same building at the same time, something easily verifiable by her classmates.

      • CoCo_Goldstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        This simplest explanation is that JKR isn’t a very good writer. She came up with an idea “I’ll give hard working and ambitious Hermione a time travel device so that she can take more classes in the same amount of time” without thinking deeply about the implications of allowing time travel to exist in the universe of Harry Potter.