I recently discovered this firefox\chrome extension that make streaming videos soo much faster. It also has built in subtitle support that lets you upload subtitles or search through opensubtitles. It’s incredible how much faster videos load https://github.com/Andrews54757/FastStream

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Automatic fragmentation and parallel requests for up to 6x faster download speeds. Watch videos without interruptions by predownloading the video in the background.

    Looks like it mostly just buffers the video more aggressively. If you have a good Internet connection it won’t do anything useful other than peg the server’s connection downloading the entire video file at gigabit speeds and make it worse for other viewers.

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you have good internet it could make it significantly better

      Tcp transfers are limited by the product of window size and latency, if I am in Australia with gigabit internet downloading from Europe then I could be limited at mere megabits with a single connection!

      • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve pulled multi gigabit between Australia and Europe back when I worked at PIA, over OpenVPN over TCP. You just need the appropriately sized buffers and window sizes.

        You need extra large buffers because you need to hold on to the packet until acknowledgement in case you need to retransmit it. At gigabit+ with some 300ms to deal with, it can be like some hundreds MB of packets, on top of the regular queue.

        But fair enough, that will workaround the issue.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Bingo, that’s the core issue. Big fat windows decrease operating efficiency at large scale and if most clients are nearbyish it’s unnecessary.

          I’ve noticed PIA do a good job, maybe that’s your work at play!

          • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Nope. Everything has been replaced by Kape’s infrastructure, from what I’ve heard. I worked there 2016-2019, so 5 years ago already.

            They did do an alright job with the app though vs what we had to deal with back then. I ran those kinds of speed tests between regions over OpenVPN in part to disprove speed complaints which, Windows + OpenVPN + TCP on Windows 7, yeah the speeds weren’t amazing but nothing I could do about that.

            It was kind of funny in retrospect though, everyone online was like PIA is faster, no AirVPN is faster, no ExpressVPN and flame wars of which one had the worst speeds. I measured it, it was all the fucking speed/latency curve on the client’s side 😂

            • ryannathans@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Hahahaha classic. I’m on wireguard so I think it’s all UDP now? I imagine the same tuning as OpenVPN UDP?

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ll have to try it out for youtube, I’m on gigabit internet (and hardwired), but youtube will often stall out when trying to buffer part way through videos and take quite awhile to figure itself out.

    • taaz@biglemmowski.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I would worry about getting rate-limited then, I’ve seen some content servers just be very picky about making too many requests (through jumping in the video too far too often).

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        “You’re trying to be efficient and you use a computer too well, you must be a bot! You’re banned.”

        My experience every time I try to use most ecommerce sites like amazon

        • mac@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s more that abnormal traffic gets flagged, and you end up getting limited

          • delirious_owl@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            I get that its abnormal for me to open twenty tabs for a bunch of products and a bunch of different queries simultaneously. That’s just being good at computers, and it should be encouraged.

            Don’t ban people who are abnormal. Machine learning anomaly detection is making the internet unusable.