• Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Indoor plumbing has actually done wonders in the developing world.

    It’s weird though, when the argument is billionaires should give up their stuff, that’s fine but when it’s we who might have to make sacrifices, that’s morality preaching? Seems incredibly conveniently selective.

    I get that no one likes thinking of themselves as complicit but that seems a pretty poor foundation for ideology.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Nobody is talking about billionaires “giving up their stuff” or making a “sacrifice”. This is about wresting ownership of the means of production away from the capitalists. I don’t know exactly what you mean by “complicity” in this particular discussion, you’ll have to clarify.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Unclear. Are you referring to human rights abuses in cobalt mining? Are you talking specifically or abstractly? About a specific industry or generally? Individually or at the national level?

          • Lauchs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            My point is that the majority of stuff that is harming or will harm the most needy in the world is because of our individual choices.

            Cobalt mining, climate change, sweatshops etc are because of our complacency and are only solved if we as a people have more empathy and consider the consequences of our lifestyles.

            But that’s a harder banner to rally around than “boooo billionaires.”