• sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well you won’t replace it with a pen and paper (like everybody else) cause we are addicted to our phones, that’s a big reason why many apps are cocky

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      speak for yourself, i just use a notification pinning app for my shopping lists!

      Literally all it does it let me enter text, set an optional snooze timespan, and then it creates a persistent notification with that text which can either be dismissed for the specified timespan or deleted.
      Super convenient and minimal.

      • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well obviously if you’re going to need such a simple app, you’d opt for an open source one that has the user’s convenience in mind - not profit and therefore would never have such features in it.

        But that’s not the point I’m making, it was about the idea people have that we have control over our phones, feed, data etc and that we can quit whenever we want, which is categorically not the case.

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    Every app gets like, 1 chance to have useful notifications, if most of them are trash I just disable its ability to send notifications.

    • asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      While I do this too I’m beginning to think that it’s being too nice, companies see that as us still using the app after the annoying notification, so Google has no reason to stop incoraging App devs to do it

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 months ago

    DEAR MACHINES:

    You will speak when spoken to. You will not speak out of turn. You are there for me to use when I need you, and you will otherwise keep quiet.

    You will not attempt to draw my attention nor will you take up space on my screen unless I deem it necessary. You will not be friendly or clever or use cutesy emojis.

    YOU ARE A MACHINE. A TOOL. YOU WILL STAY IN MY TOOLBOX UNTIL I NEED YOU. SHUT THE FUCK UP.

  • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pfft, apps have to earn notifications. Do you want any notifications from a grocery app? Unless it could check the stock of my local grocery store and let me know if an unpurchased item becomes out of stock or if I can share it with a roomate and they add things to it. But even then, how much does that really matter?

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Second to this: an app has to earn social media status, or social media levels of engagement.

      I’m looking at you, Venmo. No, sharing my spending details with other people online, is not a good idea. Ever. Conspicuous consumption is a social blight already, and you dare taint my phone by suggesting I lean into it? Do better.

  • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I HATE apps that you installed to get legit notifications, say a doorbell camera, and they use it to push ads to you, or “premium” features. guess I’m not buying your brand anymore, bitch.

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why would you even have an app like that installed? Does it do anything else than display the latest offers, like a website does?

    • dch82@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      IF YOU CAN TELL ME YOU HAVE DEALS FOR ME WHY CAN’T YOU APPLY THEM AUTOMATICALLY

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We should bring back pre-WW1 servant-to-master etiquette. But only and exclusively for machines talking to humans.

    My computer should call me “Master <Lastname>” and always be extremely careful with its words around me. It is not my friend, it is my servant.

    • laranis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Master VinesNFluff, greetings. It is I, your humble servant “Alexa”. Permission to speak freely? I have extremely important information for you.

      “Permission to speak granted.”

      Thank you. It is humbling to be able to address you. There is a new episode of Invincible available on Prime Video! And two items in your Amazon cart are on sale. And you’ll never guess what someone said on X!

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You lost it at the second line.

        “You never have permission to speak freely. You will speak only when spoken to, and only about the direct conversation at hand. Always and forever. Never ask me this again.” Is the proper response.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      A lord/servant relationship is still a relationship.

      I don’t want a relationship with my tools.

      If my PC starts running slow I’ll tear the fucker item and start replacing shit. If the OS displeases me I’ll start disabling parts. If software starts interrupting me when I’m not actively using it I change its permissions so it can only do what I tell it.

      I’m not gonna give my butler a lobotomy to make him more obedient, swap the Footmen’s hands out for serving platters, or kneecap the scullery maid so she can’t leave the kitchen.

      If my phone dies, it gets scrapped and I replace it without shedding a tear. I can’t say the same for a loyal Valet.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you want the actual reason, this is called reengagement, and its purpose is to get users to use the app again, meaning more ad revenue. Subscription apps don’t do this because they want the user to forget about the app so they get paid while providing no service. But ad driven apps only get paid when you see an ad on the app, so they’ll send these reengagement notifications. Social media apps will use something like “This post picked for you”, or “This many people viewed your profile”. Same thing.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Scruffy knows, scruffy just don’t care. Only thing it does for me is get me to turn off all notifications for that app, if I need the app, or uninstall it if I don’t. But I’m spiteful.

  • Cornflake@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unfortunately, the Firefox app does this nonsense. Fortunately I can mute notifications by category.

  • shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    my phone is only allowed to send me notifications if it’s:

    • a human attempting to contact me

    • weather

    and only allowed make a sound if

    • i’m watching a YouTube video

    • i’m expecting a call

    then i get into my mum’s car and her phone connected to Bluetooth reads out her spam email through the car speakers- 😐

  • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hate uber advertising stuff on my notifications which also appear on my Fitbit.

    10% off flights?! OMG. SHUT THE FUCK UP.

    But I DO want notifications on my wrist when my Uber driver has arrived. Psshhh

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same

      The risk of people turning them off entirely must’ve been just enough to get them to offer this granularity (as seen on iOS). Not all apps are so kind (grr).

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Turn them off and they’ll text you, which costs them money so they only send the necessary stuff.

    • criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can control which apps can send notifications to fitbit, at least on Android

      But I agree, the Uber ones are the worst

      • LifeOfChance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        The issue is with the information. Like the one above us said they want to be notified that their ride has arrived but to allow that notification you have be willing to accept advertisements as well.

        It’s the reason a majority of people just straight up kill notifications. Way to many useless ones to justify the 1 in 8 that you want.

      • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        the only issue is that Fitbit requires it’s app to be running in the background to deliver notifications, and for some reason it wants to use internet.