Former BBC news anchor Huw Edwards, once one of the most prominent media figures in Britain, was given a suspended prison sentence Monday for images of child sexual abuse on his phone.
Edwards, 63, pleaded guilty in Westminster Magistrates’ Court in July to three counts of making indecent images of children, a charge related to photos sent to him on the WhatsApp messaging service by a man convicted of distributing images of child sex abuse.
Edwards’ fall from grace over the past year has caused turmoil for the BBC after it was revealed the publicly funded broadcaster paid him about 200,000 pounds ($263,000) for five months of his salary after he had been arrested in November while on leave. The BBC has asked him to pay it back.
I knew him for that funny technical difficulties scene. I had no idea he did THAT.
I hate him now.
Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Associated Press:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
https://apnews.com/article/huw-edwards-indecent-images-court-95d3ee56ed75340cf334696db69648ef
Rich peados getting away with it as usual. The judge and the bbc should be ashamed of themselves…
It’s pretty standard to have a first offense under 2 years suspended
People who experience shame don’t act that way.
That’s why he said they should be
A 1 year suspended sentence for having hundreds of CP pics on his phone? That’s just ridiculously low.
Not sure where you got “hundreds” from. It was 40 that were sent to him by someone else. Plus a bunch of other stuff which wasn’t of minors (but obviously age isn’t the only criteria for legally or morality, so I’m unsure if the rest was “legit”).
He got into trouble because they were offered and whilst he initially declined them, he later changed his mind and accepted them (by saying “go on” after being offered again later on), knowing full well what they were.
And that’s where he crossed the line.
He had a great job and reputation over decades of work on TV. Then he goes and does that and destroys everything. Not his smartest move, for sure.
1 is too many…
True, but that’s not the point. It’d clearly be unrealistic to equate the crime to things like rape or murder.
The man’s obviously sick in the head but at least didn’t attack a child irl.
Six months!
Just plutocracies, doing plutocratic things, because they’re plutocracies.
The sentence was a custodial jail sentence. There were just two mitigating factors that downgraded it to a suspended one by a whisker: 1. early guilty plea (in the UK this reduces sentence by a third) and 2. first offense. Typically a first offense under two years would be suspended for anyone.
BBC protecting the nonce since 1963
