3·
1 hour agoTrump directs the FBI to act the way he thinks it was directed to act against him.
Problem: He’s actually a criminal. The others? Not so much.
- 706 Posts
- 18.1K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: July 30th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
5·1 hour agoI got it all blocked and then someone spun up like 30 AI porn communities and I had to block those too…
31·4 hours agoWell, I did have the advantage of having read the article. 😉
Different Fox, article addresses that. 21st Century Fox was sold to Disney. This is Fox networks, think Fox “News”.
471·19 hours agoPlot twist - It’s not a hallucinogen, it just lets you see the little people who are always there!
1·20 hours agoWorld explicitly excludes internal US news.
“We’re afraid some of our most sensitive conversations were being recorded,” an administration source told Axios. “And we have no idea which ones.”
Can’t be that hard… which ones involved Pete Hegseth? There you go!
3·23 hours agoObligatory:
Hard to tell in the pic, but it looks like mostly cheese, which is why I don’t buy Hot Pockets. 😔
Remember the “good” ones? (yeah, even the “good” ones weren’t actually good, just tolerable).
I wouldn’t really call it “Retro”, more “Industrial”.
Stewart Cowley did an art book of stuff like this back in the day… let’s see here…
“Spacecraft 2000 to 2100 AD” published in 1978.
https://archive.org/details/spacecraft2000to0000cowl/mode/1up
YouTube is the poster child for enshittification, it’s not a valid example for anything else.
If generations are using YouTube as a primary news source, we’re all in deep, deep trouble!
As a moderator, it’s not on me to develop a better system. I enforce the rules set by Admins and the people who created the communities.
In the communities I personally created, the rules are different.
Quotes above. You’re dissembling now. Congrats! Logged for posterity!
Who ELSE has Russia invaded because they stated the victim was being the aggressor?
Look, I know your name is “Commie” but you have a serious blind spot here.
So when Stein said:
“We should encourage Ukraine to be neutral; we helped foment a coup against a democratically-elected government, [resulting in a government] where ultra-nationalists and ex-Nazis came to power.”
“So let’s not be single-issue–instead of fomenting a hostile Ukraine we should be leading the way in establishing a neutral Ukraine that would allow Russia to not feel under attack,” Stein added.
That isn’t JUST Russian propoganda, those are direct talking points from Putin.
But at this point you personally are a lost cause, it’s been proved over and over again in this thread. This is purely a reply for posterity so anyone searching your history can bear witness to how thoroughly owned you are on this topic.
Because non-aggressors are well known for wanting to attack. 🤣
You’re twisting yourself in a pretzel trying to avoid the obvious.
Over and over Stein parroted Putin talking points, which is why the Russians helped her and why she was at dinner with Putin.
Literally 3 comments ago… Here, let me make it easier for you:
https://ballotpedia.org/Jill_Stein_presidential_campaign,_2016/Russia
She recommended that the U.S. “encourage Ukraine to be neutral” so that Russia would not “feel under attack.”
Putin talking point.
https://www.thirdway.org/memo/jill-stein-a-russian-asset-and-a-hypocrite
she talked about ‘the need to rein in American exceptionalism’ and replace ‘a U.S. policy based on domination’
Putin talking point.
parroted the Russian position on Ukraine and criticized the U.S. for installing a government in Kiev ‘hostile to Russia.
Putin talking point.
“Russia’s invasion was a provoked response to the bigger, more murderous and illegal game plan of US empire… In 2014 the US backed a coup in Ukraine led by far-right insurrectionists. The installation of the new government was a giant step towards the goal of adding Ukraine to NATO - and putting hostile bases and nuclear-capable missiles right on Russia’s border.”
Putin talking point.
The OWNER has been disclosed, it’s the source of FUNDING being obscured. But considering who owns it, the Qatari connection absolutely makes sense:
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09814915
"1 officer / 0 resignations
BESSASSO, Jamal Awn Jamal
Correspondence address7th Floor, 1 Sussex Place, Hammersmith, London, England, W6 9EA
Role ActiveDirectorDate of birthDecember 1969Appointed on8 October 2015
NationalityDutchCountry of residenceUnited Kingdom
Identity verification due21 October 2026"
So who is Jamal Awn Jamal Bessasso? Well…
Former director of planning and human resources for Al Jazeera in… wait for it… Qatar.
Al Jazeera, as good as they are, has a notable blind spot with Qatar due to THEIR funding, most folks recognize that, so it makes sense MEE would be the same.
This doesn’t mean either source is necessarily out of line when reporting non-Qatari interests, but definitely grain of salt worthy otherwise.
And repeatedly parroted Putin calling Ukraine the aggressor. LOL.
Like if I break into your house and call you the bad guy.
I remove posts that break the rules, “truth” doesn’t enter into it.
If I allowed the rule breaking posts I personally agreed with and removed only ones I disagreed with that would make me the evil mod people accuse me of being.
Sucks when a good story gets spiked, but if you can’t source it outside of Youtube, Twitter, or Substack is that really a good story? 🤔
Trump directs the FBI to act the way he thinks it was directed to act against him.
Problem: He’s actually a criminal. The others? Not so much.