• MetaCubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    To everyone pearl clutching in response to this correct meme with one of the following phrases:

    • “That’s how you create an echo chamber”

    • “paradox of intolerance doesn’t say how to fight fascism”

    • “This is about silencing opposing thought”

    I would like to take this moment to remind you that the paradox of intolerance isn’t about exiling those who disagree on economic policy; it’s about recognizing and directly opposing those who are trying to harm or disadvantage others and doing so in a meaningful way that will actually change the outcome. You can’t debate Hitler out of doing a genocide, but you could have jailed him before he gained power.

    Being too spineless to call out and fight intolerance enables fascism. The longer you live wrapped up in your civility politics, the overtones window shifts further right, and it strengthens the fascist support. It happened in pre-WW2 Germany, and it’s being repeated in dozens of countries worldwide. If you feel the urge to block me, go ahead…

    …but know that this is your fault

    • teamevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      The paradox of intolerance is not a paradox. Tolerance is a social contract, folks who demand us tolerate intolerance are violating the social contract and should be ignored.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      You all should see the shit going on in a post about Gisèle Pelicot where they are literally saying that the tiny fraction of women who commit sexual assault is an excuse for decrying the (absolutely understandably angry) women holding signs that say “NOT ALL MEN BUT ALWAYS A MAN”.

      I really fucking despise these false equivalencies.