Was trying to read a news story and… What fresh shitfuckery is this? Why do I now have to pay money to a company just for the privilege of not being spied upon and not getting your cookies that I don’t want or need? How is this even legal?

RE: “Why are you even reading that shitrag?” – I clicked on a link someone posted in another sublemmit, didn’t realise it was the Sun till after. I do not read the Sun on the regular, chill. My point stands regardless that this is extremely shitty and should probably not be allowed.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    And, though I don’t know about this one in particular, just because you pay not to have personalized ads, doesn’t mean you’re paying not to have your data tracked and sold by this company or to not have tracking cookies added to your browser by them that other sites can use to target ads to you.

    It’s just that they won’t use the information they collect or buy or get from partners’ tracking cookies or advertising IDs already on your system to target the ads you see while on their site and logged in.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Where’s the option where they send me their home address so i can mail them a baggie of my chili lunch liquishit?

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    It asks to play DRM content but plays videos anyway.

    Their devs must be so sick of their business dept.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The best part of this is you would need to give them your personal information to pay them, and you’d need to accept the necessary cookies for them to know you’ve paid when you access the website. 🤣🤣🤣

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      you’d need to accept the necessary cookies for them to know you’ve paid when you access the website

      Cookies that are required for and only used for operational purposes (like knowing if the user is logged in) don’t require consent.

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    I find it amusing that they “use cookies to give you the best possible experience”, but then ask you to pay to not have them.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is a legitimate option per EU guidelines btw. They just want you to accept cookies.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean, do you expect news to be free?

    Either pay for it by selling your data or with money, or don’t use their website.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh no. It’s not like that. They don’t even ask you about cookies any more.

    This is a payment so they don’t sell all your cookie data to their 1354 trusted data partners/advertising vultures.

  • phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    It looks like the big buttons are “accept all” or “pay for no ads”, but the cookiescan still be tuned with the link under the “accept all”?