You use that seemingly as a means to discredit the site, but if you actually read the article, you’d see that it’s very explicit about the speculative nature of its subject. It makes no false claims; it only describes an interesting (if improbable) theory and attempts to explain the rationale behind its inception. Seems above board to me.
https://seekernotes.com/elon-musk-government-operative-darpa-neuralink-starlink/
From the same site that brings you
https://seekernotes.com/earth-hijacked-humans-hypnosis-frequency-obelisks/
You use that seemingly as a means to discredit the site, but if you actually read the article, you’d see that it’s very explicit about the speculative nature of its subject. It makes no false claims; it only describes an interesting (if improbable) theory and attempts to explain the rationale behind its inception. Seems above board to me.