You must log in or register to comment.
Those are two completely different things. It is like saying “why hammers not apples?” There is no logical answer, they are just two completely different things.
I was confused, but I think they might be asking why Veracrypt isn’t available as a flatpak
this, sorry for the title
I’ve interpreted like that as well. 🤔
Go ask them https://mastodon.social/@veracrypt
I would assume because the whole model of encrypting your drives and installing bootloaders doesn’t blend well with the flatpak sandbox
You can give a Flatpak the necessary permissions to modify disks. All the permissions needed by Veracrypt could be granted.
and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? that it can be used with older dependencies? if so, is that a good thing to have for things that modify system startup?
and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package?
Flatpaks is a universal package format, it works almost everywhere. Also, there are immutable distros, that use flatpak as the default package format.
I haven’t used veracrypt to encrypt linux system partitions. Does it do all the decryption in user space somehow?
