2.0 means they’ve decided to change their license to a subscription model, and put all the useful features behind a pay gate. You can’t leave because they have all your data and there’s no export feature.
Version 2.0 doesn’t necessarily mean improved. If we go by semantic versioning and we leave the compatibility aspect out then 2.0 just means a significant amount of features have been added to warrant a major version increment.
Usually features mean better user experience but not necessarily. For example Hitler 2.0 would have less focus on antisemitism, more focus on general racism. Feature change, but not really an improvement.
I dunno, the first time Hitler tried to do what Mussolini did, he ended up in prison. Mussolini was more competent but had to make do with an Italian army while Hitler was less competent but got farther because it was still a German army supported by German engineers and scientists.
I think Trump to Hitler is more accurate, especially when considering Putin for the Mussolini role. Ukraine would be Ethiopia (though with more support this time around instead of just league of nations hand wringing about the whole thing). Israel/Palestine would be Spain, except it’s entirely one sided.
I hope Trump loses (election and coup/civil war) before we find out who gets to be Poland and France this time around. As a Canadian, I’m a bit nervous, about either that or being more like Austria. Though if we could be Czechoslovakia and just give them Alberta, I could live with that (other than seeing that BC would likely also be annexed).
Yeah, even Texas has some decent people. And tbh, Canada could end up being more like Hungary or Austria because there’s a large conservative presence here, too.
Version 2.0 implies an improved version.
Version 0.1a is more apt because of the shoddy programming and rollout.
Maybe where you went to school.
2.0 just means I’ve decided the bugs I’ve introduced since 1.0 are now “features”.
Can I pay for use on a monthly basis with the hopes that a stable product is possible in 2-4 years?
Sure.
Fires half the dev team for share buy backs.
2.0 means they’ve decided to change their license to a subscription model, and put all the useful features behind a pay gate. You can’t leave because they have all your data and there’s no export feature.
Version 2.0 doesn’t necessarily mean improved. If we go by semantic versioning and we leave the compatibility aspect out then 2.0 just means a significant amount of features have been added to warrant a major version increment.
Usually features mean better user experience but not necessarily. For example Hitler 2.0 would have less focus on antisemitism, more focus on general racism. Feature change, but not really an improvement.
Trump is just the Hitler we have at home.
He is more of a Ozon.ru Hitler.
v2.0_rc-1
Damn bro there are kids on here go easy
More like Mussolini 2.0
I dunno, the first time Hitler tried to do what Mussolini did, he ended up in prison. Mussolini was more competent but had to make do with an Italian army while Hitler was less competent but got farther because it was still a German army supported by German engineers and scientists.
I think Trump to Hitler is more accurate, especially when considering Putin for the Mussolini role. Ukraine would be Ethiopia (though with more support this time around instead of just league of nations hand wringing about the whole thing). Israel/Palestine would be Spain, except it’s entirely one sided.
I hope Trump loses (election and coup/civil war) before we find out who gets to be Poland and France this time around. As a Canadian, I’m a bit nervous, about either that or being more like Austria. Though if we could be Czechoslovakia and just give them Alberta, I could live with that (other than seeing that BC would likely also be annexed).
Please no, it’s already bad enough here under Smith, I don’t want Trump in charge
Yeah, even Texas has some decent people. And tbh, Canada could end up being more like Hungary or Austria because there’s a large conservative presence here, too.
So you’re saying the trains are going to run on time.
Got it.
Despite how common that saying is, trains in Italy were a shitshow under Mussolini