Providence St. Joseph Hospital and the California Attorney General’s office have reached a temporary agreement in a case alleging the Catholic-owned hospital in Humboldt County violated multiple state laws by denying emergency abortion care to pregnant patients.

Last month, Attorney General Rob Bonta sued Providence St. Joseph Hospital in Eureka, alleging it illegally refused to provide emergency abortion care to a woman who was 15 weeks pregnant and hemorrhaging.

According to the stipulated agreement released Tuesday, St. Joseph agrees to fully comply with the state’s Emergency Services Law, which prohibits hospitals from denying patients emergency care.

The hospital will allow physicians to terminate a patient’s pregnancy if not doing so would seriously risk the patient’s health. The hospital also agreed not to transfer a patient to another facility without first providing emergency stabilizing care, including abortion if that is what a patient needs.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    What kind of Doctor wants to stand by and watch a woman bleed out on the table? I’m sure there were sighs of relief.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    5 days ago

    This isn’t even abortion, really. This is about the inability to see the bigger picture.

    15 weeks and hemorrhaging, that fetus is already no longer viable. It’s too late for the fetus. Not too late for the woman, though.

    Refusing abortive services in such a case should be charged as manslaughter at least.

    • Aviandelight @mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Just adding this article here from the ACOG about how tenuous the definition of viability is and how few babies actually make it when delivered in the 20-25 week mark. We love to focus on those miracle babies who do make it this early but it is definitely not the norm.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      No, it’s murder. A decision was made to let the woman die, and the person who made that decision should be charged with murder. The fact that it’s policy makes it premeditated.

      They can’t even claim religious reasons. The Bible has an abortion ritual and says multiple times that life begins at first breath.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    5 days ago

    “yes, women may die, but that’s a sacrifice we’re willing to make”

    -forced birthers

  • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Violating laws is a crime, yes? Therefore arrest the administrators. Make sure they’re fingerprinted and enjoy the full experience of jail processing. They’ve earned it.