lol so this is cherry-picked data. They link to a source that shows if Kamala had been more conservative in these areas, she would’ve had more support:

Immigration Fossil fuels Ukraine (withdrawing support)

It also said that 14% said her support of Israel made them more likely to vote for her. 9% said it made them less likely.

Maybe MOST importantly is that the issues the polled on, in order of importance to voters, shows Gaza ranks LAST in importance. Shame on Common Dreams, I expected better.

It’s so easy to lie with data, thanks for illustrating that

Edit: okay, this is hilarious. Even the source they linked is wrong: “New Poll Shows Gaza Was #1 Issue For Biden 2020 Voters Who Did Not Vote For Harris”

Then the actual data disproves this. Neither for Biden voters who switched or Biden voters who backed Harris, it was not the top. For those who switched, it was NEAR the top. For others, it was dead last.

Also, the poll is exclusive to swing states.

I have literally never seen k used in percentages before. Km is common, as is using it if you’re writing out LARGE numerical values (10k or above).

I’m not saying it’s difficult to understand. I’m saying it looks stupid.

Skimmed the article and I’m still confused. Why can’t people just link to the actual data?

To piggyback on this, left-leaning echo chambers tend to underestimate the impact of turning on Israel amongst older voters, who tend to be more religious.

It’s literally the stupidest possible way to write it

Except Yass is like the face of oligarchy and the one reason Trump wants to stop the ban

Can’t blame him on that last one tbh

Please stop posting reliable sources that have a left-leaning bias!

You might have joined the wrong platform

Go to a porn site and type “scissor” in the search bar

wtf would the point of a pause be?

Grandma? You aren’t the best at guessing ages

I bet we can fundraise to get you there so you can just poop on the floor in the middle of the hearing. You can be the hero

Anti-trans laws have only increased in recent years. Having a Republican president won’t impact state legislatures and their momentum on this

What, did you turn go straight from 16 to 30?

Willing to put money where your mouth is on that timeline?

Conservatives don’t need another reason to roll this back besides money

4% of reported crimes. That’s even worse

To be fair, the judge specified that it was because he won reelection, not because he was a candidate

It happens, no worries. That’s why I usually comment instead of delete with Rule 4

Ha, I actually did misread your comment lol