• Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 days ago

      I disagree, I think if you provide ownership of the company as part of compensation you can pay people to care. No big companies do this, but I think they could!

      • MinusPi (she/they)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        In that case, they then care primarily about the success of the company. The quality of the product is secondary as long as it sells.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        There’s plenty of companies with stock options as part of the compensation package. They’re always just a bone thrown in. They absolutely do not want employees to be able to effectively do a hostile takeover of their own company and set it up as some kind of commie worker cooperative.

        • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’ve changed my mind and I’d like to disagree with my previous statement. You can’t pay people to care.

          Very good point. I worked for an employee owned company and I hated the work, but loved the atmosphere. There really was this sense of everyone there working together to make everyone better. I don’t think stock options can provide the same atmosphere, the employees need to have agency around leadership choices as well as the compensation that comes with it.