• underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They had legitimate reason to believe they were in danger. Not assault at all. Unlikely to be assault.

    Edit: Guess I shouldn’t say “definitely not assault”. Don’t have all the information here, so can’t come to any definitive conclusions.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        A man, in a hoodie, that speeds up his step when they try to walk away from him faster, at 2am. Context matters a lot here.

      • Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        The entire greentext is about OP going out of their way to look as threatening as possible while still having plausible deniability. Like… Your position goes against the OPs intent.

      • underwire212@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        It’s more than just “a man within range of vision”. Obviously we don’t have the full story here, but even in the text, there are specific behaviors that would, arguably, make a reasonable person suspect they were in imminent danger. Depending on the state, that is enough to trigger self-defense definition.