• Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wonder how many of these people are just now realizing that they have immediate family and friends who won’t be here next Christmas.

      • shiftymccool@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re not swallowing toothpaste. I don’t know enough about the effects of fluoride to agree or disagree with the removal. Being a guy with healthy teeth, a …few years under his belt and living on well water for damn near all of them, I’m pretty comfortable saying leave it in the toothpaste where it’ll have fewer unintended consequences

        • Strykker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          It has been proven in repeated studies that fluoride in the water helps prevent tooth issues for children in low income families.

          There is much less fluoride in water than in toothpaste, so the swallowing comparison is a little bit extra.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I don’t know enough about the effects of fluoride to agree or disagree with the removal

          Then why even comment on it? You realize that there are people who do know a lot about this stuff. Like they’ve dedicated their lives to studying it. And I imagine you could even find their published research online. You know, like actual science? Do you remember how the scientific method works?

          But nah, instead you’ll just make an unwarrantedly confident comment about something you know nothing about based on “vibes”

          Just like American voters.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Unfortunately RFK isn’t all wrong on this one. Recent evidence is showing it is indeed linked to neurological issues… Furthermore the effects are kind of negated by fluoride in the toothpaste.

        https://keck.usc.edu/news/fluoride-exposure-during-pregnancy-linked-to-increased-risk-of-childhood-neurobehavioral-problems-study-finds/

        The long-awaited report released Wednesday comes from the National Toxicology Program, part of the Department of Health and Human Services. It summarizes […] that drinking water containing more than 1.5 milligrams of fluoride per liter is consistently associated with lower IQs in kids.

        […]

        Since 2015, federal health officials have recommended a fluoridation level of 0.7 milligrams per liter of water, and for five decades before the recommended upper range was 1.2. The World Health Organization has set a safe limit for fluoride in drinking water of 1.5.

        https://apnews.com/article/fluoride-water-brain-neurology-iq-0a671d2de3b386947e2bd5a661f437a5

        These margins are razor thin.

        https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/still-need-fluoride-drinking-water-benefits-may-waning-study-suggests-rcna173790

        • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Respectfully, I’m going to be immediately suspicious of any study that uses IQ as the measuring standard. IQ is not an objective measure of intelligence or cognitive ability. The same person taking the test will probably have a different score every time they take it. I’m not saying fluoride does or does not have an effect on cognitive ability or intelligence. But IQ is hardly going to be the way to figure that out.

          Edit: I also don’t know how you’d conclude it’s fluoride and not literally anything else they’re consuming.

            • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              You only linked one? The other is referenced in an article. The way these studies were conducted and the populations used does not immediately translate to fluoride being the issue since that wasn’t the only variable. It’s worth exploring, but it’s really not enough to change decades of dental hygiene improvements.

        • Smoogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The researchers analyzed 229 mother-child pairs, calculating fluoride exposure from urine samples collected during the third trimester of pregnancy. Most urine samples were collected from fasting women, which improves the accuracy of chemical testing. Children were then assessed at age three using the Preschool Child Behavior Checklist, which uses parent reports to measure a child’s social and emotional functioning.

          Children exposed to an additional 0.68 milligrams per liter of fluoride in the womb were 1.83 times more likely to show behavioral problems considered to be clinically significant or borderline clinically significant. Specifically, children exposed to more fluoride had more problems with emotional reactivity, somatic complaints (such as headaches and stomachaches), anxiety and symptoms linked to autism.

          No association was found with several other neurobehavioral symptoms, including “externalizing behaviors” such as aggression and attention problems.

          Hmm, they are using a statistic as their study and parental reporting… what with PFOAs, pthalates, microplastics and parabens already present in water linked as endocrine disrupters I wonder how that plays over top of all of this fluoride as well.

    • eletes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Years of GOP meddling with education, which is only gonna nose dive when dept of education gets dismantled

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bloody hell, this is the US version of Brexit… this world would be such a better place if people just did the bare minimum of reading into what they were actually voting for before they fucking voted!

    Also, seeing the other top searches being about the tariffs would have me creasing if it weren’t so disappointingly stupid that these peoole seemingly knew nothing about Trumps most advertised economic policy before (assumably) voting for him

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 month ago

      Whenever I see all the trash on the side of the road, I know why the world is that way.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, the US version of Brexit was Trump’s first term, since they both happened in the same year.

      This is just people saying they know exactly how bad Brexit went the first time and they want that again.

    • aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      Español
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think that most of them do a lot of reading. The problem is that they just read news and info that they like and have no ability to criticise arguments. Critic thinking is the main problem imho.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Of course, let’s not let things like knowledge or consequences get in the way of reactionary & spiteful arrogance informed only by propaganda induced fear and hate, emotions know to prevent rational thought /s

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    What annoying about this information is that we can’t say who did that. Is it Harris to trump or trump to Harris or those who voted for other options.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think we can reason that its more than likely trump to harris. Not just because trump is a terrible person and lies about everything. But mainly because trump won so what need would there be to change a vote from anything else to trump?

      • Fillicia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        You underestimate how much people want to be part of “the winning side”.

        Especially now with how Trump treated those against him

  • whithom@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I love it. America’s last hope and people failed. Fuck this place. Let the civil war begin.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    Something is seriously wrong with civics education in this country. People in power have no incentive to fix it. At least naturalized citizens have to take a fairly stringent test.

  • CAVOK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is this the “Find out” stage then?

    Actions have consequences. Sad people had to figure it out this way.

  • Cuberoot@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Are we all just assuming these searches are from people who regret their votes and hoped to be able to change it?

    I double checked my ballot before submitting it, with full knowledge that irrevocability is the price of anonymity. Nevertheless, I might use similar search terms if I was curious how many other voters, possibly in other states or with different political alignments, had written about regretting their votes. Or, perhaps, … if I was doing research for a post-election article about the topic.

    • smayonak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s a great point. The Trump team tried to get all voter information from all states in 2020. Ostensibly to verify voter fraud. But this data was probably used to create such voter suppression systems as Eagle AI.

      So they know who you voted for.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is all bullshit, designed to start another wave of outrage. Even after the election, we’ve gotta have more stuff to rage about. News these days is just rage all day every day, no matter what.

    • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had to have new anxiety meds called in because all of the political stuff is sending me into panic attacks. I’ve been avoiding politics as much as possible since the day after the election because it causes so much anxiety.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve said it the whole election cycle. The news downplayed every Trump gaffe because they wanted him back to fuel the outrage click machine. They wanted that sweet revenue back after 4 boring years of Biden just ya know doing his fucking job.