🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoBluesky says it won’t train AI on your postswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1377arrow-down120
arrow-up1357arrow-down1external-linkBluesky says it won’t train AI on your postswww.theverge.com🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squaredaggermoon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·1 month agoWhy is this taking off but not Mastadon?
minus-squaremke@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 month agoWhich marketing and better how, exactly? Can anyone please point me an example of Bluesky marketing that isn’t word of mouth or large-event headlines on the news?
minus-squareWoovie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·1 month agono, this place only circle jerks about the fediverse blindly and hates anything with a modicum of attachment to reality.
minus-square0xD@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·1 month agoIt’s easier to use and has a recommendation algorithm.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoHow is it easier to use?
minus-squareColdWater@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoBecause it has just one instance and choosing an instance is too hard to Twitter users
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 month agoBluesky gives you the option to choose an instance, too.
minus-squareTakios@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoBarrier of entry is marginally lower. With mastodon you’ll have to make a decision on what instance you’re creating your account. With Bluesky there’s just Bluesky.
minus-squaremarx2k@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoWith bluesky ,the sign up has a section where you choose a server. The bluesky server is prefilled. Otherwise you add your own. But not having that default option and instead having to have the user go research and figure out which server to use is an immediate turn off.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoMastodon has one big, official node, too, though: joinmastodon.com.
minus-squareDoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoYep. 100% this. Bluesky has the hyper casual “barrier’” of entry that Twitter had
Why is this taking off but not Mastadon?
Better marketing
Which marketing and better how, exactly?
Can anyone please point me an example of Bluesky marketing that isn’t word of mouth or large-event headlines on the news?
no, this place only circle jerks about the fediverse blindly and hates anything with a modicum of attachment to reality.
It’s easier to use and has a recommendation algorithm.
How is it easier to use?
Because it has just one instance and choosing an instance is too hard to Twitter users
Bluesky gives you the option to choose an instance, too.
Barrier of entry is marginally lower. With mastodon you’ll have to make a decision on what instance you’re creating your account. With Bluesky there’s just Bluesky.
With bluesky ,the sign up has a section where you choose a server. The bluesky server is prefilled. Otherwise you add your own.
But not having that default option and instead having to have the user go research and figure out which server to use is an immediate turn off.
Mastodon has one big, official node, too, though: joinmastodon.com.
Yep. 100% this.
Bluesky has the hyper casual “barrier’” of entry that Twitter had