superkret@feddit.org to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-28 hours agoOS market share in Top 500 supercomputersfeddit.orgimagemessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up1637arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1631arrow-down1imageOS market share in Top 500 supercomputersfeddit.orgsuperkret@feddit.org to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-28 hours agomessage-square118fedilinkfile-text
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercomputer_operating_system Author: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Benedikt.Seidl Data from: http://top500.org/stats
minus-squaretate@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down1·24 hours agoAh hahahaha!!! Windows! Some dumbass put Windows on a supercomputer!
minus-squaresteal_your_face@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up58·18 hours agoProb Microsoft themselves
minus-squareIrritableOcelot@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up16·17 hours agoGood point. But still, the 30% efficient supercomputer.
minus-squareAscendantSquid@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoI don’t think either of the chart’s axes list efficiency?
minus-squareAllero@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up49·edit-216 hours agoIronically, even Microsoft uses Linux in its Azure datacenters, iirc
minus-squareKoalaUnknown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-27 hours agoApple uses both Linux and Windows (not for datacenters) too.
minus-squareThaurin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·10 hours agoA supercomputer running Windows HPC Server 2008 actually ranked 23 in TOP500 in June 2008.
minus-squaretate@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-25 hours agoI always forget that Windows Server even exists, because the name is so stupid. “windows” should mean “gui interface to os.” edit: fixed redundacy.
minus-squareyogurtwrong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-24 hours agoBut Windows Server has GUI. Although a server having GUI (not webui, desktop) is kinda stupid
minus-squareKubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 hours agoI’d say having a GUI is not inherently stupid. The stupid part is, if I understand it correctly, the GUI being a required component and the primary access method.
minus-squareFuryMaker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43·22 hours agoProbably need one, just for the benchmark comparisons.
minus-squaremvirts@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down2·17 hours agoAnd Mac! Whatever that means 🤣
Ah hahahaha!!!
Windows! Some dumbass put Windows on a supercomputer!
Prob Microsoft themselves
Good point.
But still, the 30% efficient supercomputer.
I don’t think either of the chart’s axes list efficiency?
Ironically, even Microsoft uses Linux in its Azure datacenters, iirc
Apple uses both Linux and Windows (not for datacenters) too.
deleted by creator
A supercomputer running Windows HPC Server 2008 actually ranked 23 in TOP500 in June 2008.
I always forget that Windows Server even exists, because the name is so stupid. “windows” should mean “gui
interfaceto os.”edit: fixed redundacy.
But Windows Server has GUI. Although a server having GUI (not webui, desktop) is kinda stupid
I’d say having a GUI is not inherently stupid. The stupid part is, if I understand it correctly, the GUI being a required component and the primary access method.
Probably need one, just for the benchmark comparisons.
And Mac! Whatever that means 🤣