🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agoAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square80fedilinkarrow-up1474arrow-down149
arrow-up1425arrow-down1imageAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agomessage-square80fedilink
minus-squareSaledovil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up48arrow-down2·1 day ago How is that “dehumanizing” when human is literally in the explanation. Had it been “female apeoid” I’d have agreed, but humanoid… So “moid” for male humanoid is “dehumanizing” too? “A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up32·1 day agoI stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
minus-squareclickyello@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·22 hours agograceful. props to you. more people should be like this.
“A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid
A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
I stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
graceful. props to you.
more people should be like this.