• bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    pov when you rather kill foreigners than feed your own (are they still going thru with those anti-homeless public seats? lol.)

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      What do you mean, different? Every country is different from each other. If you were clear about what you’re implying here, i.e. “different as in having no negative sides” then it would be obvious that your argument is against an absolute straw man. Nobody made such a claim.

      It’s not like China doesn’t have issues but I think you don’t understand or want to think about just how incredibly fucked up the USA is. China is definitely way less bad.

      How many countries have they couped? How many civil wars in poor countries are they responsible for? To you in your comfy home this is just academic but these are the worst atrocities in human history, and the USA does them one after the other after the other.

  • m_f@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Would China not drop bombs if they faced no consequences and it benefited them?

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Idk, they probably have had the opportunity sometimes, but they don’t have the same military industrial complex as the USA pushing for it at every chance. So the cost benefit analysis is different. Quite often it doesn’t benefit “the USA” as much as a few specific people within, and that mechanic doesn’t exist in the same way for China.

      • m_f@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What do you mean that mechanic doesn’t exist in the same way for China? Are you talking like China has achieved a classless utopia situation?

        • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          No, the arms manufacturers just don’t have the same level of influence over the government and armed forces that they do in America, and the people in the government who decide whether to drop bombs won’t personally get rich if they buy more bombs.

          That isn’t something unique to China btw but basically almost every country except USA and a few others.

          • m_f@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Do you think that dynamic wouldn’t exist for any country, including China, that had as much world influence as the US does now?

              • m_f@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                My point is that the real hard-to-swallow pill for people like OP is that China is not a magical place where everyone just sings kumbaya all day. China is just like any other country comprised of humans that has existed ever, and would do the same things the US is doing now if they could. The only reason this meme is in any way accurate is that China can’t realistically drop bombs like that, otherwise they would. Tankies like OP will defend imperialism all day long, as long as the imperialists say “Death To America!”. If the US poofed out of existence today, there would be a power vacuum quickly filled by exactly the same sort of people that are dropping those bombs in the meme.

                So I guess my question is “What’s the point of pretending that China is any different?”

                • daltotron@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  42 minutes ago

                  China is just like any other country comprised of humans that has existed ever, and would do the same things the US is doing now if they could.

                  Yeah, except they’re different countries, made up of different people, with a different culture, with a pretty much fundamentally different kind of organizational structure governing them. I don’t think “well, they’d probably do it too, if the US were gone” is a super convincing argument in favor of the US dropping bombs on people.

                • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 minutes ago

                  That’s just a thing you made up to justify not feeling bad, there is no reason to believe that anyone else would act the same way.

  • lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    …says the guy on Lemmy criticizing the U.S. government and not getting thrown in jail for it.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You do understand that free speech that doesn’t threaten the government is tolerated everywhere, right? Us having more free speech here is just a function of the US government feeling more secure in its power, you can still find examples of free speech being punished in the US when it has threatened its power.

  • illectrility@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    On average? So you just take all bombs dropped by the USA and divide it by the number of days the US has been a thing? Then you compare that to the amount of days China hasn’t dropped a bomb?

    This makes no sense…

  • Castor_Troy [comrade/them,he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Is that 46 on average also for the past 40 years? Do you have a source for this? Not trying to wreck your post, but I’d like to drop this on some non-leftists one day at the appropriate time, and I want to be confident that the information is reliable.

  • bad_news
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    15 hours ago

    And those are like $10 mil apiece minimum, but no free lunch for YOUR unworthy poor children. They would rather pay $1000 to kill a foreign child than $1 to feed yours.

    • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The $1000 comes from us and goes into their pocket… The $1 would come out of their pocket and into our kid’s mouth… Although, we’d probably need to buy the food from them too so the $1 would still end up back in their pocket… But the point of the system is to take money out of our pockets and put it in theirs, not to take it out of one of their pockets and put it in their other pocket