• random@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    you see, every country would be fighting israel rn, if it’s land was taken by it, so does it really matter?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      After world war 2 we absolutely adjusted the borders of countries and there was no issue. We could have easily given them a chunk of Northwestern German coastline. By 1955, when occupation forces left, it would be a done deal.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m not really sure they’d have been down with being Germany’s weaker neighbors, even if that was probably the only “fair” place to carve a nation from.

      • random@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        but the way they split it was at least culturally coherent, they only took the ethnically different parts from germany for example, the only exception I can think of is southern tirol, where ethnic austrians where put into italy

        also no one had to resettle, because they ended up in countries where people would share their culture and speak their language mostly, now if you took a big chunk of land where people lived, they wouldn’t really want to give it up