Like, we’ll probably find out that eating boogers actually makes you immune to select illnesses or something crazy like that.

  • Anissem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think you have something there with the booger theory. Please do testing and report back.

  • mortalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve got a couple that roll around in my head, radiation therapy will be seen as barbaric at some point. Assuming we don’t burn ourselves off this earth in the next few years I think we’ll see some progress on this. Moderna is known for their COVID shot, however they have basically eliminated melanoma with a tailored injection. Last I looked at it, it was in it’s mid stage or something and was almost 100% effective.

    • Berttheduck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Honestly most cancer therapy is like that. Chemo and radio are basically working on the fact that your body is more resilient than cancer cells so they will likely die before you do. They are not pleasant things to go through. Surgery is your best option if it’s available and that involves chopping out chunks of yourself.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      7 months ago

      radiation therapy will be seen as barbaric at some point.

      We already know it’s barbaric. It’s a last resort. It kills you and the cancer, only the cancer gets the worst of it. It’s a terrible solution to the problem, only a step better than death.

    • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Radiation therapy is bad. We know that, its a last resort tool to fight cancer. Once we find something to finally kill cancer before getting to that stage, i hope to see no more use of such treatment.

  • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think it’ll be wild if AI actually becomes incredibly intelligent. I’m thinking specifically about materials and what crazy new one AI could dream up but at a level that would require it to actually think and not regurgitate some LLM data it scraped.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      what crazy new one AI could dream up but at a level that would require it to actually think and not regurgitate some LLM data it scraped.

      A LLM wouldn’t be useful but I wonder how far this can be done without AI (machine learning) technology, just programmatically like with protein folding simulations.

  • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Aspartame cures cancer, but only when ingested in soda.

    Pi equals exactly 3.

    The most effective, universal vaccine is based on asbestos.

    • Pyrin@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      That may actually explain why I rarely get sick. I’m having a hard time remembering a single day of this year where I was sick that wasn’t caused by things like eating uncooked foods or something else of that nature.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Gravity + velocity: the practical applications of time travel. That or anything investigating anything to do with sentient energy because that will shit all over 99% of every religion.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If it turns out there really is no free will. What will happen? Do we get a kind Utopia? Or fascism where you are mistreated based on your lot in life?

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s no functional difference, unless you can accurately predict someone’s actions, and to do that you’d need to predict the environment in which someone is making choices as well, which requires omniscience. So, there’s no functional difference.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, but if there is true free will, the universe would not be perfectly predictable. If it is, then there could not be free will. Luckily, it isn’t.

          • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I would say deterministic rather than predictable.

            I think the universe is deterministic and that there isn’t something inside our heads that bypasses determinism and creates free will.

            • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              But we know for sure that the universe is not deterministic.

              From a fundamental level, it is probabilistic.

              Simple experiments can show this chaotic action.
              Take for example the dripping tap experiment. The time for next drop cannot be predicted by knowing the timing of the previous drops!
              This is not a random process, there is a pattern, but it is also clearly not deterministic.

              • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                We can’t predict it because we can’t possibly know everything. But unpredictably isn’t the same as randomness or implies nondeterministic behaviour.

                • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  If you are really interested, look into the uncertainty principle.

                  At this point in science we are as convinced as is possible to be; that the universe is probabilistic in nature.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Remember the reasons we have punishments? To discourage further misdeeds. Also, to restore justice by inflicting suffering on those who deserve it. Punishments would still be dished out for pragmatic reasons, but retributive punishment would be rendered entirely meaningless.

        It would also shatter all sense of acomplishment an individual could have. All that would be left is maybe a perverse pride in knowing you where born “better” than others.

        I don’t think society would survive if it was a common knowledge.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Like I said, how can you prove that free will exists now? We could very well already live in your scenario, and the world isn’t ending because of a lack of free will (if it doesn’t exist). I mean, it is ending, but not because of free will or the lack thereof.

  • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Like a fairly realistic one: measurement exclude a cosmological constant as the explanation for cosmic acceleration in favour of a quintessence scenario.

  • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    A consistent model for the expansion of the universe that explains the different rates observed