Like at some point won’t all of the profit be squeezed out of society?

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Numbers in ledgers is a description of banking but money and banking are not the same thing.

    Alternatively you could be describing money management, keeping a ledger of an account. Money management is the management of money but it is not money itself.

    A collection of coins or bills is worth a certain amount and when you add or remove money the amount changes but you do not need to update any accounts.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m making a distinction between money as a system of abstracting wealth and what wealth practically means. You’re making a highly disputable philosophical argument about the ontological nature of money instead of engaging with the germaine ideas. Simply put: I don’t consider a physical representation of money to be money in-and-of-itself; I consider each bill to be a part of a grand fragmented ledger. Furthermore, bitcoin is literally a public ledger for which there is no physical exchange of any representation of money. As a final example, the Yap isles famously have a monetary system that has physical Incarnations but no physical exchange among the people of the isles. It’s literally just a public ledger that exists in the minds of those who use it.