Even gamers nexus’ Steve today said that they’re about to start doing Linux games performance testing soon. It’s happening, y’all, the year of the Linux desktop is upon us. ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ

Edit: just wanted to clarify that Steve from GN didn’t precisely say they’re starting to test soon, he said they will start WHEN the steam OS releases and is adopted. Sorry about that.

  • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I jumped into Linux, via Mint, about a year ago when I refreshed my hardware. The transition was pretty easy, and I haven’t looked back. Steam runs fine and I haven’t had a modern game that didn’t work under default proton settings except for things I’ve run outside Steam and mods. Most of my personal PC’s workload is gaming and handful of web-based apps that are effectively OS-agnostic; Everything else has an easy equivalent in the apt repos.

    I would say that my decision to embrace Linux as my OS was primarily influenced by my Steam Deck. Gaming on it has been simple and the desktop UI was easy to adapt to. I replaced my laptop with the Steam Deck, bluetooth keyboard and mouse, and a USB-C dock with HDMI out (all things I already had for the laptop). I now just hook into whatever TV is handy as a monitor when I need a computer on the go.

    I was a tech enthusiast when I was younger, and am thus familiar with fucking around on the command line, but now I’m an old man who just wants his stuff to work and it just has… The barrier of entry for the Linux Desktop is effectively gone. We just need PR now.

    Also, I think I’d replace Mint on my primary PC with SteamOS, given a simple way to do so. About a year ago, the desktop/beta SteamOS was not fully baked.

    • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You should give Bazzite a go on your desktop, it’s very similar to SteamOS and the desktop experience has been great for me. I didn’t have a Steam Deck and transitioned to it, and the smoothness convinced me to get a Lenovo Legion Go and install Bazzite straight OOTB.

    • lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s true that a big slice of gamers play games with anti-cheat solutions that don’t work on linux. That said most of those aren’t even on steam, which is the biggest pc game marketplace, so I’m not sure it’s that big of a dealbreaker for that many people.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        you don’t have to onsider off platform titles on its own. just take proton DBs list and sort by playercount and youll have your handful of misses on some of the top currently played titles. that already filters the non steam games already, and it still has its small handful of titles not on board yet.

    • penquin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They’ll come around when the userbase increases. We live in a capitalist world, and these fuckers will always follow the money. They have zero principles, they just want the money.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      That will be more likely as more people start using SteamOS.
      If SteamOS can get enough users, then not supporting it will start to hurt the game developers profits.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or getting players & friends to stop playing those types of games when there are so many compatible games to choose from.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Let’s be honest here, they only care because when someone inevitably fucks up, people will think the fault is with windows.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        “Cant have those TenCent CCP botnets sniffing the same customers WE’RE sniffing! Get outta here!”

        –M$, prolly lol

    • pizza_the_hutt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      99
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      IMO, no one should be playing games with kernel level anticheat. There is no way I would let any big gaming company have that level of control over my PC. It’s a security nightmare.

      • plant_based_monero@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        If gamers were buying in their best interest nintendo would be bankrupt, there is what gamers should do and there is the real world. The sad reality is that only the low end gamers care about vanguard and they aren’t paying the bills in riot

        • Ptsf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I wouldn’t say it has anything to do with the financial affluence of the gamer, but I agree with you that the vast vast majority of gamers simply do not care. Like with a lot of things, that same majority would be better off if they did.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        After that huge “Salt Typhoon” hack against major telecoms, you’d think people would take “security nightmare” a little more seriously!

        Truth is though, your average Valorant/League/Whatever player probably isn’t even aware of it running when they smash through ok -> ok -> agree -> yep -> accept -> accept -> ok -> play.

        Any kernel-level anything connected to major corporate servers should be scary and taboo, but except for the alarm-raisers who know what they’re talking about, most people don’t even understand the implications.

        I’m glad Steam is at least marking a big “This game requires kernel level anti cheat” on store pages now. It looks ugly, possibly scary, so maybe that’ll raise some awareness and make developers not want to go with it.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        sadly theres a line between shouldn’t and how the market responds to it. Regardless of the fact, it is a hurdle, and the reason why not all of the top games on the concurrent player list on steam is playable on SteamOS, whether one likes it or not.

      • DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wonder if Valve will eventually offer their own system of checks similar to Google Play Integrity? I don’t think I’d care for it since it’s an invasion of personal choice on a device that you own, but for people who want to play competitive games with cheating problems, running a partition with integrity checking seems a fair trade.

        • xavier666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          If it’s an immutable system, it should be easier to ensure system integrity IMO.

        • lordnikon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah you can do most of that server side but they don’t want to pay for it. Why pay when your players let you coop their machine for free or even better yet pay you for the privilege. Also player run dedicated servers would fix all of this. Don’t like the cheaters movement servers. Own the server ban them. We had this working just fine in the 90s.

          • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 hours ago

            I would imagine it wasn’t that large scale back then. I wasn’t in the 90s so I wouldn’t know. But some games with player servers are filled with extremely triggering names and env, if you know what I mean. I’d rather prefer the current matchmaking.

            • lordnikon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              The tick was to find your sever. With Quake 2 and Team Fortress Classic. You would find a server that meshed with the community that fit you and you would go to that server. You got to know the players that would come back over and over. It was a micro community in the larger community of the game. You became a regular sometimes were even giving mod rights very much like a lemmy community. Yeah there were asshats just like there is on here but you just don’t engage with them.

              Hell back when quake 2 was in heat.net we would just hang out and chat in the lobby. When playing mechwarrior 2 they had clan websites and we would battle other clans in brackets. I started in that clan by just random showing up in that lobby and someone was nice and taught me how to account for lag when targeting other mechs.

              It takes a little more work to find or create your community but once you do it’s so much better than the company directed dull experience. Stuff like surf servers in counterstrike or bombing run basketball servers in unreal tournament would not exist without player controlled dedicated servers.

              Also scale didn’t mater since it was decentralized like lemmy is. The company didn’t have that much control of what players did with their severs. That’s what this is what this is all about control. They want to make sure you see what they want you to see to buy that cosmetic to feel fomo. To play how they want you to play. So emergent gameplay almost never happens anymore.

    • ADTJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      It does often feel like as soon as a significant hurdle is overcome, the industry just makes another one.

      Hopefully SteamOS/Steam on Linux gets enough traction to force publishers to reconsider.

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        And with every step it’s getting better. 10 years ago almost no games were natively supported and you needed to fuck around a lot to start anything with wine and most didn’t work anyway. Nowadays everything just works, and the only category of games that doesn’t is that slop with kernel level anticheat.
        The improvement was monumental.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The reason why I can’t try Marvel Rivals with friends.

      Fuck kernel-level software from commercial companies, though!

    • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      i have faith this will be resolved eventually/they will have to admit kernel anticheat isn’t even meaningfully more effective and give up on it. anyway loads of people don’t play multiplayer AAA so it’s a no brainer already for them. as the mass of people migrating continues to grow devs/publishers hopefully will have to catch up. 2% of the steam hardware survey is linux now, it could be 5% within the decade. that’s my optimistic outlook, i know i shouldn’t underestimate how out of touch the epic games suits etc. are though

  • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I just did that. I have a dual boot laptop where Windows was used exclusively for games, and instead of upgrading that I built myself a PC with an AMD GPU (Nvidia, fuck you!).

    So far I haven’t run into any problem that I couldn’t easily solve, and the only games that won’t run are those demanding I install an anti cheat system, but I’m fine not playing those.

  • videogame [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just in time for Windows 10 to lose support in October 2025 and for me to never switch to Windows 11 because it sucks and I hate it

    • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Every so often they’ll release an update that breaks everything, or they’ll patch something and the processor improvements will be bigger than intel or amd get out of a generation, showing how gimped it was to begin with.

  • Cheems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    I recently switched to fedora and I didn’t think it would be difficult, but it was even easier than I expected. Every game I’ve tried to play has worked perfectly.

    • WbrJr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Fedora was my first distro. But i hat issues with Hardware in my framework laptop, which should have good Linux support. But what was even more annyoing was that Video and audio codec die not work right away because it does not support proprietary which made life horrible difficult for a noob. What are your thoghts on that?

      • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Different person here but I’ve been using Fedora for many, many years. This discussion comes up all the time and though RPMFusion is a checkbox in the software store GUI people obviously would like to have Nvidia proprietary drivers and proprietary codecs as an easy install like from a button click on install.

        The problem is that Fedora has had a FOSS only core value since the beginning and I’m sure a big part of that is to keep Redhat out of legal troubles but it also resonates with a lot of the actual Fedora volunteers (those folks on the SIGs that do all the work).

        I don’t think it’ll change anytime soon. Normally the response to this is “then new users will go elsewhere” or “If Linux wants to (something number of users or something market share)”. The thing is the Fedora project doesn’t ‘care’ about that and why should they?

      • Bilb!@lem.monster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m curious, do you recall what hardware issue you had? I’ve been using Fedora-based Aurora on my 13 and 16.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    The only bastion left is anticheat. Everything else are just (bad) old habits fueled by marketing.

  • gramgan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I thought this had already happened?

    I remember seeing ads on Steam for SteamOS years ago—wasn’t there a point at which you could download and run it on your own computer? What happened?

    • penquin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If I recall correctly, this has never happened the way it’s happening now. It was a matter of “hey, you can fork it on GitHub and make your own iso thing”, hence why there was a “holoiso” or something like that that (I keep forgetting the name) where people used if they wanted to install steamOS on a device. This one is straight supported by valve. Like “hey, here is our official steam OS that we use on our steam deck. Use it and we will support you”.

      • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        My understanding is the big change here is that they’re specifically making it available to other handheld manufacturers, which is huge, because windows handhelds have not been great because of how much the bloat of Windows steals performance and battery life. They’re making steps to make SteamOS (I.e. Linux in general) the default OS for handhelds and non-console dedicated gaming machines in general.

        If it works, it will put tremendous pressure on publishers to support linux, which is great.

      • bodaciousFern@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Iirc the original steamOS was Debian based and you really had to be an experienced Linux user to use and enjoy it.

        With the new steamOS (arch based?) it’s a much more streamlined experience and opens up the user base because of it

    • Belgdore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Old steam os was an Ubuntu derived OS. Ubuntu has issues relating to the organization that runs it. New steam os is basically a coat of paint on top of Arch which is community based. The old os is deprecated.

      The version on steam deck is fantastic, but they have been polishing it for desktop use for a while now. I can’t wait to have it available.

    • jjagaimo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I think modern steamos is based on a different distro then it was then. Also proton is good enough now to justify switching for a lot of people

      • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        Yeah, choosing Arch as the base of something that’s supposed to be newbie-friendly and stable is wild, but it seems to have been working so far.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      From what I recall, it wasn’t something you could easily use like a normal distro, and that version was based on Debian (so stable but outdated software). It only worked on some hardware, and you had to do a full system wipe.

      More likely, this is them officially partnering with handheld or gaming laptop makers, using their latest Arch-based distro and allowing them to use Valve/Steam branding as a selling point.

  • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    In my case it’s a sign I might should try out PC gaming again. I’ve been console exclusively for like 15 years now because so few games used to work. But with Steamdeck’s popularity we might actually start seeing more than 10% of games getting native ports 🤞

    • DesolateMood@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      At this point we don’t even need native ports. Developers can just make a windows version and we can play it with proton

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Having more developers natively release for Linux implies removing influence from Windows and making more people realize it is a viable option for daily computer use.

        It’s not just about gaming at this point, it’s about changing an entire paradigm and erode monopolies.

        Can you imagine a Linux “monopoly” on personal computers? The dumb discussions about using Arch, Fedora, Debian or Suse? It would only be hot air escaping mouths because under the hood every development on one side is feeding improvement into the entire ecosystem.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Every game I bought on Steam under Windows runs great on Steam in Linux Mint. The few games I didn’t buy on Steam (Deus Ex, Giants: Citizen Kabuto) run great on Wine, using the default settings.

    Adopting Proton was the smartest thing Valve ever did. They’re going to get about 90% of gamers migrating from Windows to Linux, who don’t want to fiddle with configuration settings.

  • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I never really gamed on PC except for Command and Conquer Red Alert and Age of Empires 2. I still got a Steam Deck and it replaced my PC and not just for gaming.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I have about 7-9 months to decide what to do with my PC. I don’t want to move to windows 11. Because I will have to basically fresh-install my entire system that has 4 drives and god knows how many antiquated programs on it from the XP, Vista and 7 era that I still use. and Im just not ready for it. Im too busy

    headache

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Its just gonna be a question of how unsecure Win10 gets , and how fast.

        My pc is from 2019, although I’ve upgraded the hardware several times. But I’ve basically reached a ceiling of practicality, its no longer practical to upgrade anything. Im on an outdated chipset (AM4) and jumping from a 3080 to a 4080 isn’t really going to fix the problem of games just being unoptimized. It makes more sense to build a new PC than it does to just change OS on this.

        but right now, it just doesnt make sense to build a new PC either… I dont lift a finger on anything unless im going to be able to see at minimum 20% performance increase, I just dont see that without emptying my savings account…

        • penquin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Im on an outdated chipset (AM4)

          Bruh, why do you have to say that? 😂. I just built my PC a couple of months ago and I bought an AM4 and I thought I had some kickass specs.

          • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            No worries about that, it was a bad wording. The company has stopped producing it, and that’s it. Your cpu is fine, compatible with current software, and can serve you well for still a long time.

            Corporations were so successful in promoting consumerism, that they already messed with us on a psychological level.

            • penquin@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Oh it’s totally fine, my friend. I just thought it was very funny. No hard feelings towards the commenter at all. I even actually laughed out loud. I’m that guy who never buys a brand new car, always used and has to be a great deal. Shit works, why spend the extra money? When you are bron and raised in a poor 3rd world country, you learn to be very careful with your money when you have it.

          • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Realistically the AM4 is still more than enough for now. but its technically end of life. the AM5 isn’t worth the jump until theres no other option.

            • penquin@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Oh yeah, it is doing all I want it to do. Plus, on Linux I’ve learnt that having a bit older hardware is always better since the software for it is mature and works no problem in most cases. Absolutely zero complaints for what I paid for it. $500 for a whole PC is unbeatable

          • Sheldan@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            They did still release a few ones recently for them. But am5 is the main one right now. It’s not incredibly old, just no new ones will probably be produced. (I think the last am4 were a surprise already) Just for curiosity, why did you go with am4?

            • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              might have been a deal. some retailers are dumb and think lower number means worse, so discount justified. lol

              • penquin@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                100% nailed it. I bought all parts for $500. Works great. The processor is a Ryzen 7 5700G and it comes with an iGPU, so I didn’t get a dGPU at the time, a friend of mine had an RX 580 laying around and gave it to me. Gamed on it for about a year or less, worked fine. Later on, I got an RX 6600 from Facebook for $100.

                • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  They are end of life now and have ceased production, but if you can manage to find a 5800X3D , that CPU is the definition of sleeper. I had a 5700X I think it was, and the performance boost was f***ing unreal, I expected meagre gains, I saw 20 to 50% performance increase on many games. if you’re into that kind of thing. if you see one for sale, seriously think about grabbing it.

                  its the whole reason aside from the OS issue, Im not even remotely worried about the next few years, it can compete with the high end stuff of the AM5 generation still. unreal.

            • penquin@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              The honest answer(s), money and I didn’t know any better, especially in the AMD side. I hadn’t learnt their numbering schemes and I saw Ryzen 7 and thought “hell yeah”, but it turned out it’s a 5700G and the newest is the 7000 series. lol. Still powerful as hell. I bought the whole thing from microcenter and I had the salesperson pick the parts for me. I restricted him to $500 and that’s all we were able to get with that money. I have no issues with it whatsoever. I can play all of my games on 4k mid to low settings. Not much fps, but I’m a guy who’s ok with a game if it runs at 30 fps.

        • polle@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Not a good advice. A friend of mine is still on win7 and it still works and got security updates time to time. But some programs actually stopped working or only older lts versions remain workings. Win10 is probably still ok for a year or two.

        • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It makes more sense to build a new PC than it does to just change OS on this.

          I haven’t made comparisons with gaming, tho I know there is somewhat, but there’s been a big performance boost on desktop and regular applications running Bazzite over Win10.