octopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago"Free" Speech Absolutist™lemmy.mlimagemessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down126cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1image"Free" Speech Absolutist™lemmy.mloctopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square94fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareoctopus_ink@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·edit-23 days agoBut then do you ignore that research when the result is different than you expected? Like this one? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/22/twitter-admits-bias-in-algorithm-for-rightwing-politicians-and-news-outlets Or will you not claim exactly the opposite of what the article you provided shows when the topic comes up the next time around? Because there is little point to doing your OwN rEsEaRcH if you are going to ignore the outcome anyhow when it doesn’t fit your worldview.
But then do you ignore that research when the result is different than you expected? Like this one?
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/22/twitter-admits-bias-in-algorithm-for-rightwing-politicians-and-news-outlets
Or will you not claim exactly the opposite of what the article you provided shows when the topic comes up the next time around?
Because there is little point to doing your OwN rEsEaRcH if you are going to ignore the outcome anyhow when it doesn’t fit your worldview.