Babybonita@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoWho can relate?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1535arrow-down118
arrow-up1517arrow-down1imageWho can relate?lemmy.worldBabybonita@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareGodric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up27·3 months agoSome other interesting Lent exceptions include gator, beaver, and muskrat, being considered “fish” theologically speaking.
minus-squarerhombus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoI’m glad I’m not the only one who immediately hears that every time the word beaver pops up.
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·3 months agoThere’s a case to be made for them all being fish biologically speaking, too. Of course, that case would also mean making chicken, beef, and all the other meat people typically eat would be fish, which might defeat the intent of the rule.
minus-squarevoodooattack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months agoAnd good luck if you’re allergic to fish
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up19·3 months agoGlad I don’t have to give up eating beaver for Lent
Some other interesting Lent exceptions include gator, beaver, and muskrat, being considered “fish” theologically speaking.
Removed by mod
I’m glad I’m not the only one who immediately hears that every time the word beaver pops up.
There’s a case to be made for them all being fish biologically speaking, too.
Of course, that case would also mean making chicken, beef, and all the other meat people typically eat would be fish, which might defeat the intent of the rule.
And good luck if you’re allergic to fish
Glad I don’t have to give up eating beaver for Lent